Press secretary Karoline Leavitt claimed the apparent war crime was legal even as she said Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth knew nothing about it.

The White House on Monday shifted the blame for killing the survivors of a U.S. military strike on an alleged drug smuggling boat from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and onto the commanding admiral.

Killing survivors of a destroyed vessel is literally an example of a war crime in the U.S. Department of Defense Law of War Manual. “For example, orders to fire upon the shipwrecked would be clearly illegal,” the manual reads.

Press secretary Karoline Leavitt, nevertheless, repeatedly stated that it was legal – even as she further claimed, as Donald Trump did Sunday, that Hegseth was unaware that it had happened.

  • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    217
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    And this is one of the many, many good reasons why one does not comply with illegal orders, damn it!

  • UnspecificGravity@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    107
    ·
    10 days ago

    Oh look, exactly what Mark Kelly was talking about. Shit rolls down hill guys. Remember that when someone orders you to murder people.

    • massacre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      9 days ago

      The top brass who aren’t full on MAGA, but didn’t leave now have clear proof that they are expendable and will be scapegoated to protect Trump and his croneys. Honestly showing their hand at this stage gives me a lot of hope that any coup won’t happen now and resistance will be strengthened from within. I smell leaks coming!

        • kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 days ago

          I’d rather be illegally discharged and deal with that in court than proceed to murder people so my boss isn’t mad at me.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    10 days ago

    Killing survivors of a destroyed vessel is literally an example of a war crime in the U.S. Department of Defense Law of War Manual. “For example, orders to fire upon the shipwrecked would be clearly illegal,” the manual reads.

    RTFM

      • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        That’s like what my understanding of fubar was, face unrecognizable, belay any response.

        Thanks Dad.

        Combined with a pretty bad case of face blindness led me to telling a fellow classmate a professor was “fubar” in public…

        • ジン@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 days ago

          I’m confused—I thought that acronym was ‘fudged up beyond any repair’? I also don’t get ‘belay any response’. Does this mean to ‘remain unresponsive’? The confusion here being that belay means to halt essentially—so the word choice doesn’t make intuitive sense to me.

          If this was all just a setup for the joke, apologies for the technicalities

          • NABDad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            10 days ago

            Your understanding of the term, assuming you replaced “fucked” with “fudged”, is correct. The explanation given by the father was a lie to avoid teaching curse words to a child.

          • xorollo@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            I think it works as instructions on how to face Cthulhu. Or maybe explains deer reacting to headlights.

            Edit: I was reading ‘face’ as a verb as in 'to confront", instructing you to face the unrecognizable.

            On the other hand I guess it could be a suggestion that you hide any recognizable facial responses to something.

  • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    10 days ago

    As they should. But the fact that he chose to follow an obviously illegal order, doesn’t absolve the ones who gave that order. This should in no way, take the heat off Hegseth…or Trump himself.

  • jaybone@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Follow illegal orders, get thrown under the bus.

    Dont follow illegal orders, get thrown under the bus.

    • Instigate@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      9 days ago

      The Narcissist’s Prayer:

      That didn’t happen.
      And if it did, it wasn’t that bad.
      And if it was, that’s not a big deal.
      And if it is, that’s not my fault. <— we are here
      And if it was, I didn’t mean it.
      And if I did, you deserved it.

    • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      10 days ago

      I think we’re currently in the phase where it’s rapidly undulating between both takes.

      Give it another week and it’ll devolve into “what firing on shipwrecked people? What are you talking about? Lalalala, I can’t hear you!”

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 days ago

      I mean, probably nothing. Its not like anyone is going to investigate or prosecute. Trump’s just throwing up chaff so he can whine about the press treating him unfairly. “We didn’t do it, but if we did it would have been based and cool, and don’t think we won’t do the thing we didn’t do again if we feel like it” is exactly what I’d have expected to hear from a PR flack in the Bush or Reagan Era.

      Hell, I’m pretty sure this is the line Bush Sr used when the US shot down that Iranian passenger airliner. Nobody suffered any kind of consequence for that, either. Hell, the air warfare coordinator on duty received the Navy Commendation Medal after killing a few hundred civilians.

      I bet Trump’s Navy Command is going to look like late-stage Brezhnev by the time he’s finished passing out pins and ribbons for civilian casualties.

    • UltraMagnus@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      Admiral should’ve remembered the oldest rule in the military… “shit always rolls downhill.” Don’t think for a second that your superior will cover for you when something like this happens, even if they gave the order and should also be held accountable.

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    10 days ago

    If he ordered it, or complied with the order from above, lock him up. If not, this accusation is yet another confession.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    10 days ago

    As was said elsewhere, the transmitted command will have been recorded. The hard undeniable truth can be provided. Congress just needs to subpoena it, or a soldier with a conscience needs to whistleblow and leak it. Otherwise, we trust the liars’ word and they get away with yet more of what are unquestionably, objectively, war crimes.

  • DandomRude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    10 days ago

    We also don’t fight with stupid rules of engagement. We untie the hands of our warfighters to intimidate, demoralize, hunt and kill the enemies of our country. No more politically correct and overbearing rules of engagement, just common sense, maximum lethality and authority for warfighters.

    Pete Hegseth [Source]

      • DandomRude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 days ago

        What do you expect? The man is a washed-up talk show host and a drunk. He is by no means the only completely unsuitable buffoon in this incompetent, criminal administration.

        Just for comparison: the Secretary of Education, Lisa McMahon, is a former wrestling promoter (Vince McMahon’s wife), and the Secretary of Health, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., is a conspiracy theorist and anti-vaccination advocate - not to mention the president.

        All of this is so ridiculous that it would be funny if it weren’t costing so many lives…

  • JohnnyFlapHoleSeed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    10 days ago

    Ok… So common sense would read that as: ’ it wasn’t legal, it’s a prime example of a war crime, and Pete may not have explicitly approved of that action, but probably gave a vague order like ‘no survivors’ , which the admiral took literally, and so it’s entirely the admirals fault for not disobeying an unlawful order. ’

    All I want for Christmas is a military coup, cold hard justice for the traitors enabling Trump, and emergency elections, monitored by the military, and un observers

  • flango@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    10 days ago

    First of all, blowing up a boat like is illegal. Even if it was legal you’ll have to prove that the boat contained drugs, but you just blowed your evidences! The guys that survived the attack then would have no charges over them and would be set free. Probably these guys were innocent and the boat was not a drug boat, thus they killed them as a cover up