

Surviving within the system doesn’t mean you believe in or support said system
Cool, but that’s not what the article said…
Socialism used to be something we Americans picked up in our freshman dorm room and dropped right around the time HR walked us through the concept of a 401(k) match
Like…
I quoted the literal words from the article, explained my issue with them…
And your response to that was essentially:
But what if it wasn’t what they said, what if they said the opposite?



























The only way that seems logical is if you thought what I said about “basic services shouldn’t operate for profit” somehow meant that no one providing labor for those services should be paid…
And then public employees would need to just seize what they need to survive.
But that can’t be what you meant, can it?