You better say you use Arch before you get banned.

Taxes should be progressive

Yeah ofc. Why do you think the billionaires came up with this BS plan instead?

Wow the greediest scumbags on the planet lied about giving up their ill gotten power? I’m shocked! SHOCKED! \s

NYTimes going into a grifter spiral as usual with this BS anthropomorphism.

Well yeah they always have been. Literally genociding palestine right now among other attacks.

I’m surprised at how europeans think they’re any different.

Wow the state that’s half anti-science and half moron is reversing science that it never gave a shit about? I’m shocked. Shocked!

I think looking to CompSci is the right move, but I still don’t see many folks discussing computational complexity as a real, mathematical limit.

I think this viewpoint depends on assuming that math is primarily computation. I think our education system and stories reinforce this misconception. But another fundamental component is creation. People created axioms (eg. ZFC) as a foundation for mathematics, then they chose and named almost every mathematical concept based on that foundation. Sure, there are “computations” in some vague sense, but not in the sense of computation theory. Importantly there is no right answer. People have invented alternative systems and will continue to do so. But I haven’t seen a computer compute a better computer… Anyway I agree that computation is underrated especially in terms of proofs (see recent math competition). And increased computation has allowed for breakthroughs. I’m just saying the meta framework of creating the system, defining the terms, and choosing the computations is also a huge factor.

Clickbait. It’s not mathematicians. It’s a few fringe “mathematicians”.

“mathematicians”

I think though that it’s not clear whether the world is fundamentally discrete or continuous.

Or both, neither, something else, etc.

those who see continuous distributions as just an abstraction of a world that is inherently finite vs those who see finite steps as the approximation of an inherently continuous and infinitely divisible reality.

How about neither? Math is a formal system (like a game). It has no inherent relationship to “reality” or physics. There are only a few small areas of math that have been convincingly used in physical models, while the vast majority of mathematics is completely unrelated and even counter to physical assumptions (eg tarski paradox). Questions about the finiteness or divisibility of “reality” are scientific, not mathematical. Etc.

deleted by creator

Let the pigs have their mud.

It’s actually very fascist but USAian is basically same thing.

Swisscows.com seems to be working for me but I don’t think I’m removing “trackers”.

Can you give an example? What browser is removing the “tracker portion”? How is it doing that?

The querystring can contain trackers. But for searching it usually contains your search terms. So, if your browser is removing the querystring, then searches probably won’t work.

Capitalism can’t be reformed into something good/worthwhile. That’s why its state was allowed to pass anti-trust laws. Even if companies are “broken up”, it’s just a legal restructuring. The system still profits, controls, etc. It’s political theater, not any kind of real change.

The sad part is Reddit was the epitome of socialist experiment… Now it has been perverted into the perfect capitalist AI machine

Yeah that’s why the state suicided the founder.

You mean the website that’s mostly blocked unless you sign in? lmao

I support arming the working class… But this is peak fash libs.