• Cora@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    At first I thought this was a few reference to Schwarzchild / Black Hole Cosmology.

  • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’ve been saying it for decades, we’re inside a singularity. Everyone told me that’s ridiculous and obviously not true. Latest science shows we actually just fucking might be.

    We’re talking about black holes, right?

  • JayDee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Not with our current technology I think. All the hype of ‘AI safety’ has been used as an advertisement for LLM companies, and they’ve been doing it AAAAALLL the way way back before Elon Musk even joined twitter and was hated.

    “Oh no, we better be careful or AI’s going to destroy the human race” literally at the same time that they’re pumping AI companies full of money. It’s all a scam to sell LLMs as more capable than they actually are, to crush smaller LLM competitors with regulation, and to force Governments to fund them like they’re the next atomic bomb. And it’s working on the majority of laymen.

  • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    people love making up stupid shit to sell books, yeah.

    Even the Mayans did it… or they just ran out of room in the tablet.

  • fckreddit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I do believe in a singularity where climate change is going to make everything worse, significantly threatening all life.

  • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    We might be rotating around the center of a supermassive black hole, but we sure as fuck don’t have any “real” AI.

  • Thorry@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    We’ll have the singularly right about when we have fusion, in about 20-30 years ad infinitum.

    • Freeposity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Keep in mind that the term technological singularity as it was first coined merely means reaching the point where the advancement of technology happens so fast that your ability to predict future advancements diminishes to the point of not being able to predict with any accuracy at all.

      It is a function of recognizing the exponential growth of technological advancement.

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        In the context of AI, I believe it specifically refers to the point when AI starts programming new, slightly better AIs and the exponential nature of that feedback loop

    • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Mind you, a commercial fusion reactor company is currently aiming for net energy production in 2031 using a stellarator. Their series A funding round raised 130 million Euros so investors seem inclined to believe them. Technologically it also checks out; both stellarators and tokamaks have taken major steps forward in recent years.

      The eternal 30 year timeframe has shrunk an awful lot over the last decade.

        • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          True, of course, but we did make huge leaps in fusion power in the last years. We’re currently at a stage where several teams are currently constructing reactors intended to demonstrate break-even (so more energy comes out than is put in), with ones viable as power plants already being designed. The one I mentioned plans to run their demo reactor in 2027; the 2031 one is supposed to be the commercially viable one.

          That’s a hell of a lot better than the “we will have some kind of viable reactor at some point within the next three decades” we’ve been hearing for the last 50 years. It could be several simultaneous high-profile scams, of course, but their plans are plausible.

          Mind you, this won’t take us to a future of unlimited cheap power and micro fusion reactors in every pocket. Deuterium and tritium don’t grow on trees and fusion reactors have a fairly substantial minimum size. Also, renewable power sources are a much cheaper and easier way of generating power. Fusion’s strength is that it’s a “generate a lot of heat and drive a turbine” type of power source so it can be used as a cogeneration plant (providing both power and district heating) or to provide heat for industrial processes, which renewables aren’t great for.

          • mrbutterscotch@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I believe you’re talking about Proxima Fusion? I’m optimistic, although I have absolutely no understanding of the material. But one can hope!