• FIST_FILLET@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    NO.

    1. it is US-based
    2. the CEO is the former founder of the “Names Database”

    for the love of god, use anything but DDG. Qwant is EU-based and has decent results, SearX is another one which lets you choose between instances (or host your own).

    please stop taking US “privacy” services seriously. i was hoping people would know better on here, compared to reddit

  • UprisingVoltage@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Honestly yeah. There’s been some controversies in the past, but for someone who’s looking for a zero-effort way to browse privately and support the privacy scene (DDG donates a lot of money) it’s a great choice. Wouldn’t recommend their browser/extensions though

    • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Definitely would agree with this. The best of a bad bunch. I use it for nearly all my search.

      Did see some sketchy stuff with the android app/browser so probably would avoid… and besides, I’m in a decades long relationship with firefox <3.

      • UprisingVoltage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Exactly, there’s just no reason to use anything other than firefox on desktop

        On mobile IN MY EXPERIENCE Firefox has always been unbearably slow. I’ve tried everything: getting it from play store, F-Droid and github, using the beta and nightly version, tried it with and without extensions: it sometimes took 10+ seconds to load some pages, I don’t know why. It’s been like this on other smartphone models too.

        That’s why I use brave from mobile, it’s blazing fast and it has a lot of nice features, starting from the amazing bottom bar to their solid integrated adblocker and dark mode.

    • NicoCharrua@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      You can also use ddg.gg which is even shorter!

      And you don’t even need to go the website homepage, just type something like ddg.gg/search promt and it’ll give you results straight away.

      This is great even if you use a different search engine because you can use !bangs without needing to go through another webpage.

  • PlasmaK@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    DDG still spies on you. It still better than google, i guess, but i personaly use disroot’s searx

  • knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    No. Plus the founder is pro-censorship and weighting search results based on his own worldview.

    At this point Searx is the only viable option, both in terms of privacy and results. Yes it ultimately ends up using the backend of the big three, but with customizable layers of abstraction and behaviour.

  • Milk@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    DDG was known as the best option for search engines but then they started talking of censoring stuff and also it has Microsoft trackers and other problems. Yes, it is still better than Google, Bing and Yandex when talking of privacy but with search engines like Qwant and specially SearX (SearXNG) there’s no reason to use DDG over these.

  • codenul@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Check out Mull browser. There’s mobile version as well for desktops. Its lightweight Firefox without any of the telemetry.

    • snek_boi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Thanks for the recommendation. I wonder if you’re confusing the DuckDuckGo browser with the DuckDuckGo search engine. I am assuming the post is about the search engine 🙃

  • sunflip@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I recently started using Kagi. The search result are super good, and no ads. You do have to pay tho. Another good one I like is presearch. Both of these have their own crawler, unlike most other search engines which rely on bing or Google.

  • ggnoredo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s better than google but It’s not good. Only options is self hosted searxng

  • rikonium@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I ditched it after it dropped the operators like quotes, “OR”, “AND”, and “-” which hampers it’s usefulness to me.

    • stonemilker@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Their privacy policy and data flow have been the same since the buyout, they were transparent about any implications and the mitigations put in place to protect users, so I’m alright with it. The biggest problem I have with them is sometimes getting rate-limited because of a VPN or Tor, but that’s it. Alternatives like DDG and Brave Search are usually bad for results in my native language, so I’ve been using Startpage for a couple years now and it’s nice

      • FarLine99@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        For me Brave search has pretty good results. Not as Google, of course, but enough. Definetly better than DDG.

        • Rooki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Its not about how good. How much privacy. Brave search is worse then DDG in all ways and form. Bad Search Results, Weird to get and read Privacy Policy???, Brave had at sometime a crypto miner in it.

          • FarLine99@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I don’t know why you have problem with Brave Search Privacy. They do log operating system and browser version. Is that scary? You can easily bypass this f.e. by using Chameleon Firefox extension.

    • dan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think they mostly handled it well, and ultimately the situation was resolved, but I still think they should have been a lot more up front about what they were doing.

  • felixculpa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Hell yeah. I consider myself privacy paranoid and have been using DuckDuckGo for 5 years without any problems so far. It is pretty strict about its privacy policy.