• Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I’ve slowly learned in life that every system, every design we rely on was thought up by other humans a LONG time ago, never updated or replaced with something new, and is within inches of crashing and burning at any single second.
    If you think I’m crazy (don’t worry, I most certainly do) spend a calm afternoon examining the support columns of your local bridges.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I’m glad I learned about this. I was about to make a private key with the number 5. Now I will make it with half 6 knowing that it’s more secure, and backed by science!

    • m4xie@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I heard encryption is based on prime numbers. You might want to try 7.

  • palordrolap@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Half six” is fraught with peril. One slight misunderstanding and you’ll have Germans and Dutch at your door when you least expect it and a bunch more people an hour later.

      • Ekky@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        *Puts on glasses* Akchually, that’s only if you’re counting 10’s, since we count 1’s as decimal and 10’s in pairs of snes/snaes (20), hence fifty is half three snes or 3*20-0.5*20 = (3-0.5)*20 = 50.

        Or if you’re talking 1’s, aka. decimal, you’d just remove the snes part, since common math is in decimal anyway, so half 3 decimal would be 3*1-0.5*1 = 3-0.5 = 2.5.

        EDIT: Fun fact: 100, aka. “en hundrede/one hundred”, can therefore also be called “fems” or “fem snes/five snaes”. And then there’s the ones who actually say “in twenty” instead of “snes”, so it’d be “fem i tyvende”.

          • Ekky@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Huh? TIL. Well, partly. Didn’t actively know about the “sinds”.

            So, does this mean that “snes” is just a load of bull, or are we talking different ages of counting systems? After all, just like the link explains “fyrre”, the Danish counting system seems as an amalgamation of multiple counting systems and words of the time.

          • Ekky@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            19 hours ago

            It’s just pre-imperial. We’ve left everything else behind for metric, but the snaes still roams the shadows of our counting system.

            Everyone knew what a snaes was and everyone measured in snaes enyway, it also happened to be about the amount that we stored fish and eggs as. So, instead of having to count all the fish, we simply asked for one snaes/box of fish. And if you needed 2,5 snaes of fish? well, then you simply asked for half three snaes.

            For a very interesting example of modern culture using such improvised counting systems, look no further than the USA’s obsession with measuring everything in football fields, elephants, etc…

            And for an example for saying “half x”? Ask anyone who has ever said “let’s meet at half six”.

          • Ekky@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Oh no, no game, that’s how you enable the dev tools in retro-future mode. :p

        • TimeRonin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I would really like to understand more, why do you simplify 320-0.520 as (3-0.5)*20? Is this system actually insightful into arithmetic? Is there a good tutorial about such and such?

          • Ekky@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Well, it is just arithmetics.

            The left side of the equation is just the natural expansion of the paranthesis to signify and drive home the point that we’re specifically talking half off 20.

            The middle is how it’s usually represented and follows best practices. Aka. Simplifying the equation without touching the variables and constants.

            The right side is the result for calculating the equation.

            I’m unsure of any tutorials regarding the danish counting system, though there’s bound to be some. :)

            Did I misunderstand the question?

        • cooltrainer_frank@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Det ved jeg godt :)

          But it’s fun to show that meme off. Danish numbers are wild. My bad danish gets me mistaken numbers all the time

          • Ekky@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Tænkte det nok x)

            It’s just fun to blow some non-Danes’ minds every now and again. <3

            • Kanda@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              22 hours ago

              Every time we take the ferry to get drunk our minds are blown by fem og halv treds

            • NochMehrG@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              So that’s why Duolingo hides numbers from us! (And probably also why Danish people switch to English or German no matter if you start in Danish or not…)

        • techt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          puts on novelty slinky eye glasses

          Fascinating.

          Also, small thing:

          3*1 - 0.5*1 = 3 - 0.5 = 2.5 ----------------^

    • Ghoelian@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Can confirm this caused a lot of confusion for the 6 months i lived in the uk as a dutch person lol. Eventually we just ended up saying the numbers.

  • BillyClark@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    In England, “half six” would mean the same as “half past six” aka 6:30.

    And I’ve been doing this for years: If I “accidentally” get into the 10 items or fewer line with 11 items, I just tell myself it’s a “baker’s 10.” And, of course, 12 items is a “baker’s baker’s 10,” as we have no other name for 12.

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Reinventing church numerals as a rationalisation for grocery checkout hijinks - I absolutely love this.

      • schuelermine@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Isn’t this Peano numerals? Church numerals would be if a baker’s four doubled two was sixty-four.

        (That being (λf. λx. f (f (f (f (f x))))) (λn. λf. λx. n f (n f x)) (λf. λx. f (f x)))

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Would they not be equivalent systems for this purpose? Both use the successor function as a unary representation of the natural numbers.

      • BillyClark@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I guess if I say that 1 is baker’s 0, and 2 is baker’s baker’s 0, then I’ve invented the baker’s unary base.

  • Ekky@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Heh, reminds me of my national counting system where “halv seks” would mean 5,5. Aka. half before six, and not half of six. :P