I don’t think Nirvana is an afterlife, rather a state of being where you are at peace and one with the universe. Maybe I understand buddhism wrong?
Yeah, right? How can someone who knows so much about Buddhism get a simple concept like Nevada wrong…
nevada is the source of all suffering and can only be apportioned by the cosmos
Yes, Buddhism has no say about afterlife, unless you believe in literal rebirth. Nirvana is a state of mind when one is free from Dukkha (“suffering”).
Buddhism is trying to commit suicide, but believing you need special conditions to not just be isekaid again.
Some Buddhists, like Shambala Tibetan Buddhists teach that if you can stop the cycle of cause and effect you will disappear, in a good way. I’m not sure if that’s a teaching you are meant to digest and learn something from, or if it’s more of a statement of what they think will happen when you achieve your goal to stop causing suffering.
Some Buddhists believe in energy transfer, and when you die you can be in a temporary state of energy transfer, but only temporary and not a place
Yeah but the guy did Buddhism wrong
Viva Las Vegas!
Reno is cheaper and prettier IMO
(I just use this image every chance I get)
And New Reno has better mob families
Ohhhhhmmmm, mygawd its so hot here
Makes you wish for a Nuclear Winter.
The central message of Buddhism is not “Every man for himself.”
And the London Underground is not a political movement!
Aristotle was not Belgian
Belgian
Watch your mouth
Dyslexic Buddhist
