Maybe include the second part of that paragraph i wrote:

That is why you should refrain from judgement over a human in his entirety. You can and sometimes should judge individual acts that you have witnessed or are proven.

But given the example of Hitler. Why is it important to consider the person in his entirety as evil? Aren’t the intention and act of genocide by themselves an evil that needs to be condemmend and prevented?

I find Hitler and Fascism are great examples, because the story of the fascists being evil people is a form of “othering”. They are the evil people, but we are not the evil people. This can all to easily lead to ignorance to how easily Fascism can spread and infect any people. And we see it in the way Germans wiggled themselves out of responsibility for their crimes after WW2.

To quote the Ausschwitz survivor Karl Stojka:

„Und das haben Menschen gemacht, so wie du, du und ich. Diese Leute kamen nicht von einem anderen Planeten. […] Es waren Menschen, so wie wir. Und nicht Hitler hat mich verhaftet, nicht Göring, nicht Goebbels. Der Greißler, der Hausmeister, der Schneider, der Schuster, der Bäckermeister, die haben auf einmal eine Uniform gekriegt, eine Hakenkreuzbinde, und da waren sie die Herrenrasse…“

And this was done by people like you and me. These people were not froma different planet. it was people like us. Not Hitler inprisoned me, not Goering, not Goebbels. [It was] the storekeeper, the house caretaker, the tailor, the cobbler, the baker. They suddenly received an uniform, a swastika armband and there they were the master race…

Or to say it with a caricature In Nuremberg and other places - “but he had ordered me to it”:

Judge a man by his actions, not by his words.

I hope the ICJ takes the US, UK, Germany and other genocide enablers to the trial too.

Either it is a construction with bolts you can remove to turn it into smaller segments, or you cut it into smaller pieces with an angle grinder.

From the photo it is clear that they weren’t getting the mast there with a special transporter. that would be way to expensive.

The IP helped the Internet to establish. But once established we see trends to try to limit the very technology into propriety. Think of the Facebook internet access schemes that tried to make everything go through facebook. Think of the attempts to make priviledged and throttled websites based on what the ISP likes…

When Podcasts were new, the open standard was embraced, but now we see attempts to make them exclusive too. Just that they didn’t prevail yet.

The argument is that you cannot really know. You don’t know everything a person did. You don’t know the motivations with which they act. You cannot look into their heart.
That is why you should refrain from judgement over a human in his entirety. You can and sometimes should judge individual acts that you have witnessed or are proven.

This is explicit the Bible i.e. Matthew 7:1 and the Qur’an i.e. 1:4. I don’t know how it is written in the Torah, but generally in the abrahamic religions the final judgement is reserved to Allah, as He is the only one to truly know a human.

But also outside religion, why is it that anyone should rise to judgement of whether someone is “good” or “bad” in face of serious illness or injury? Saying someone is good so he doesn’t deserve cancer implies that there is people who deserve cancer.
I know the statement is usally meant to signal compassion. The compassion should be unconditional though, as it is a fellow human that is suffering.

Thank you for your service.

Please see a mental health professional, or seek assistance if you are in acute crisis. If you google “mental health hotline” or “crisis hotline” you’ll find a number for your country you can reach out to.

I hope you are getting better soon.

Until the information is verified by neutral third parties, this gives me some WMDs in Iraq vibes.

Both Israel and the US have a history of lying to justify war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Israel is not fighting against Hamas. Israel is fighting against all Palestinians, of which only a tiny fraction is Hamas. Well or rather they are fightinf against Hamas, but they are slaughtering the other Palestinians.

Israel is past the need to defend itself. Now they are taking the opportunity to commit genocide and displace the Palestinians from Gaza.

It is not unrealistic, that there will be a new King in the next few years. Maybe enough people become sick of the concept by then.

Turkey is not part of the EU.

The people of the US have the choice to not only elect their parliaments, but also the president. They also elect DAs and Sheriffs in many places. The people of the US have more democratic rights than most other people in countries considered democracies. This includes the ability to adress issues like gerrymandering and politically demanding to change them. But the people chose not to.

The people of the US are not victims of a system that they cannot possibly adress. Some marginalized groups are. But the majority of the American people are either in favor or indifferent to the current system. And if you are not sure about it, think about how bipartisan the resistance becomes, when marginalized groups are demanding a change to the system, like how the white democratic voters reacted to the civil rights movement or BLM.

Genau wegen solchen Vorgängen ist es völlig unzureichend, dass die “demokratischen Parteien” sich jetzt freuen, dass so viele Menschen gegen Rechtsextremismus auf die Straße gehen. Es genügt auch nicht, vielleicht doch noch ein AfD Verbot in die Wege zu leiten und es genügt auch nicht, dass die AfD in den Umfragen zur Bundestagswahl wieder schlechter dasteht.

Die Organe der Exekutive und z.T. auch die Judikative werden seit Jahrzehnten langsam aber sicher von Rechtsextremisten unterwandert. Auch ohne eine AfD in der Regierung können diese tagtäglich bei Polizei, auf den Ämtern oder als Richter Macht ausüben. Solange sich die Innenminister der “demokratischen Parteien” weiter lieber damit beschäftigen Hufeisen hochzuhalten, und die systematischen Probleme als “Einzelfälle” abzutun, wächst die Gefahr weiter.

Wir müssen endlich von der Polizei unabhängige und v.a. nicht unter Weisung der Innenministerien stehende Ermittlungsbehörden für Verstöße durch die Polizei und ihre Mitglieder schaffen. Wenn sich in einem Revier rechtsextreme Umtriebe häufen, dann muss klar sein, dass damit auch die Karriere der Revierleitung beendet ist. Wer bei Polizei und Staatsanwaltschaft seine Macht missbraucht, um Rechtsextreme zu schützen oder politische Gegner zu drangsalieren, muss rausgeschmissen werden, sämtliche Ansprüche verlieren und in Fällen wie den Brandanschlägen in Berlin Neukölln oder dem Mord an Ouri Jalloh eine ordentliche Haftstrafe bekommen.

Yet the Republicans are regularly voted to be a majority in the House and Senate.

I do but ye cant see mi face on the loicence photo anyways

No no, they work for each other in exchange for money, which they use to buy goods…

Depends. You live in a city or larger town and there is various options available? Definetely not.

You live in an area where it is that or the canned ravioli and you are drunk/high/sick/an idiot? Maybe.

I agree with you except for this part:

And any nation being cheated by a cancelled deal have only themselves to blame.

It is still the US as a whole to blame. It is the US citizens who vote this party and it is the country that is failing its obligations.

Wie kommst du zu dem Schluss, dass es bei Wasserstoff einen sicherbaren Technologievorteil gibt, den man bei E-Mobilität und Batterien nicht mehr hat?

Gerade bei Batterien gibt es noch sehr viel Potential für andere Batteriematerialen, große Batteriespeicher im Stromnetz usw. Wenn man Wasserstoff als brennbares Gas einsetzt, sehe ich die einzigen grundlegend neuen Aspekte der Technologie im Umgang mit Wasserstoffversprödung. Sonst ist ein Gasbrenner im Wesentlichen ein Gasbrenner. Wenn man Wasserstoff in einer Brennstoffzelle nutzt, dann braucht man genauso Batterien. Und was Membranen, chemische Zellen usw. angeht, sind die Überschneidungen auch sehr groß.

I don’t know. Hezbollah is certainly stronger than in 2006 in relation to the rest of Lebanon. But i don’t know if they are stronger in relation to the IDF. On top there is the question how much support each side would receive.

I think that this is secondary to Netanyahu though. His political survival (and staying out of jail) depends on continuing war. And i think he expects the US, UK and Germany to support Israel no matter what. That is also why now US Elites are drumming up for war and why Iran and allies want the US military out of Iraq and Iraq wants them out to not become a warzone again.

The question will be how much support the US can muster in its population.

Wasserstoff ist einfach zu teuer, um damit Sachen wie den tagtäglichen Arbeitsweg zu beschreiten, oder die Wohnung zu heizen.

Die FDP setzt auf Wasserstoff, um dann feststellen zu können, dass es doch mit Erdgas gemacht werden muss, weil man nachhaltig produzierten Wasserstoff nicht bezahlen kann.

Das ist maximale Technologiefeindlichkeit