That doesn’t even resemble a coherent argument. A price point doesn’t change whether hardware manufacturers have any kind of obligation to open their platform or not.

It’s also a lie. Nintendo doesn’t sell jack shit at a loss and never will.

Because trying to sue 4 giant companies at once on shaky legal ground is exceedingly stupid.

While trying to sue just 1 giant company on shaky legal ground is inadvisable.

Nintendo has not sold a console at a loss in 30 years.

The suit(s) over this kinda thing that already exist are ridiculous.

What’s next? Are these clowns gonna argue that competing stores having sales or lower prices than their own is anticompetitive?