• ol_capt_joe@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    What happened to the Celts’ oral traditions? How are indigenous Australians’ historical depictions still stayin’ alive, stayin’ alive?

    (Is it because ignorant bozos like me are oblivious to them?)

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      While the aboriginals underwent and still endure settler colonialism it hasn’t been as long or quite as thorough as the Roman occupation and then christianization that the celts went through. Australia is also so much bigger than the UK, so it would be hard to complete a very effective act of genocide against spiritual or tribal leaders as they did to the druids.

      Even so some Celtic oral traditions were still going on strong up till the 19th century, often being little changed over thousands of years.

      • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Hey just a language note, Aboriginal is not a noun, we don’t say “aboriginals”. We say “Aboriginal people”.

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Ahh, my bad. I am remembering from old American text books from my college days that utilized Aboriginals and Aborigine, both of which i am discovering are incorrect, outdated, and offensive.

          My college days were a long time ago and I don’t get many opportunities to speak about aboriginal people, so I’m not surprised I’m behind the times. Thanks for the update!