• RiverRock@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    No, steadily is the word.

    Because it’s several thousand days, tens of billions of dollars and what a million dead over projected estimates.

    What estimates?

    That’s evidence of attrition

    Yes, Russia had been using an attrition strategy for most of this war, using drones and shelling to exhaust their opponent’s reserves of troops and equipment. The reason this has been working is that Russia can field more troops and is producing more equipment.

    It’s Manchester United going 0-0 with an incredibly low ranking pre kindergarten team woke chanting about how close it was.

    Then you’ll have to forgive my confusion as to how and why the kindergarten team now fully controls one fifth of Man U

    • Madison420@lemmy.worldBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      Putins comments to reporters said two weeks, the intercepted plans lay out a two week strategy those are estimates.

      You get that attrition is the dumbest possible thing to use a strategy when you start a surprise war with an overwhelming disparity of force right? Like choosing the way most wars are lost as a strategy reenforces the fact they’re quagmired.

      Again you miss the point, a group of grown men shouldn’t not lose slower they should have already won and handily at that.

        • Madison420@lemmy.worldBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Which time, he says a few weeks at the start and he’s said it’s coming to a close about as often as trump says Iran has been defeated.

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                still waiting for the source for your fantastical claim

                Also, in breaking news, an anonymous source has informed me that Madison420@lemmy.world regularly shits his pants in public.

                • EmmiLime@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Looks like the CIA-bot malfunctioned when you provided an actual source that contradicts their claim :^)

                • Madison420@lemmy.worldBanned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  It’s already been provided, use your fuckin eyes comrade ain’t read good and stuff.

                  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    You’ve provided no such thing. Go read up on what a primary source is instead of making a clown of yourself in public. This is frankly pathetic.

        • Madison420@lemmy.worldBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          he spent more than two hours with Khan discussing the minutiae of Moscow and Islamabad’s bilateral relations. Putin came across as “chilled” during the talks, said a source close to Khan. Afterwards, he invited his guest to stay for an unscheduled, lavish Kremlin lunch. At one point, Khan asked about the elephant in the room: the war that Putin had unleashed a few hours earlier.

          “Don’t worry about that,” Putin told him. “It’ll be over in a few weeks.”

          https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2026/feb/20/a-war-foretold-cia-mi6-putin-ukraine-plans-russia

          • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            This is literally someone told that someone else told them something that the third person say to the other person…

            This is only trustworthy because you trust The Guardian.

            • Madison420@lemmy.worldBanned from community
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              It’s intentional, their source is a third party source reporting on a second hand source of a closed meeting that literally cannot be verified because it’s closed door.

              Add to that their source is an entertainment network who in court said they are not a news source, that they do not provide news only entertainment.

              It’s harassing them with a source only mildly more trustworthy then their own.

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 months ago

                So did I genius. What you gave is hearsay. What I asked for is a primary source of Putin or any other Russian official saying something of the sort on record. It doesn’t exist because the whole story is made up for gullible simpletons such as yourself.

                • Madison420@lemmy.worldBanned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Dumb dumb your fox link is an entertainment networks correspondent reporting on a closed door session via third party anonymous source. Get a fuckin clue dumb dumb.