• davetortoise@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    It would “work”, but it would be aerodynamically unstable so would be limited to low speeds (<~25mph). This is why this configuration is quite common in construction/industry site machinery, where high speeds are unnecessary and unsafe.

    • 87Six@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      That thing looks like a contraption I built in besiege or some game like that

    • SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, this isn’t rocket surgery

      Also, yay for an actual work truck, and not one of the weird oversize impractical monstrosities that so many people seem to swoon over these days

      • 87Six@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        not one of the weird oversize impractical monstrosities that so many people seem to swoon over these days

        I heard a real kicker recently. It was something like

        My truck looks like it shouldn’t be able to haul it but it can. Yours like it should be able to but can’t.

        Best instagram roast of a modern truck guy I’ve ever seen.

        They were arguing on a post about that guy’s massive grocery getter where he was defending the purchase, as usual.

        • SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yup, someone on Lemmy mentioned about needing a pickup truck for work … I specifically remember that that same day I’d seem three workmen on a single 125cc scooter towing a trailer with tools and a bunch of 2x4s on it.

          • 87Six@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Hahah brilliant

            My dad and his workmates just use a VW Sharan for construction work. By the stuff they do to it, it’s impressive that all 4 wheels are still attached.

            It always baffles me when people say they NEEEEDED to buy a new work truck when I see how dad uses their sharan at work.

            • SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yup. At work back home the security guys have new big pickups … they literally never ever ever have to carry stuff or go off road.

              Meanwhile where I’m working under contract, the security guys have small capacity motorbikes yet manage to be more intimidating (their main purpose)

      • Fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’ve got some big ass American iron too, but it’s old and actually worth a shit. Never understood lifts you need and ladder for, and 3’ beds. Totally worthless vanity boosters.

        Trucks are for doing shit, not hauling your sorry ass to the grocery store.

        • SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Exactly. Take a 1989s LWB F250 with crewcab for example - full length bed, carries a work crew, can do a reasonable amount off road, and can be absolutely beaten on for years.

          That, I can respect.

      • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I had a giant metal ladder fall off of the top of a work van and come right at my windshield while I was driving to my own wedding. i barely braked in time, but it had some serious Final Destination vibes. All things considered, I still think that the scariest thing that day was the final bill for the wedding.

    • nullspace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I wanted to get one of those tiny grandpa trucks when they were going for like $4k new, but apparently they’re illegal everywhere in the US. We’re stuck with $60k “entry level” monster trucks.

      • Fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        They’re illegal in some places, but I think they’re mostly fine. The deal is you can’t import a foreign made car unless it’s more than 25 years old, so the poor American car companies don’t have to compete.

        The real scam is the importers get 'em in Japan for a couple hundred bucks at auction, haul 'em over here and sell 'em for 8k plus. They’re pretty rad, but parts can be kind of a bitch.

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    I used to work at a furniture factory and we got all our steel delivered in a truck with this configuration. 8m and 10m lengths on the shortest possible wheelbase. No backseat though.

  • nullspace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    You can get this functionality by driving a hatchback and putting the passenger seat down. Those cars fit way more than you would think.

  • JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    In a collision, you are much safer if you are facing backwards because your spine aligns with the back of the seat instead of you rag-dolling forwards. So turn those seats around, too. The design is very human.

    • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Cool! But I’m struggling with the title of the article. This cab truck was the most single ever? There were other cab trucks that were single, but this one was the most single of them all? Am I misreading this somehow, or is that title just weird?

      • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Single cab trucks prioritize cargo space over seating space, generally having only a single bench seat that fits 2 adults and a child, or three often uncomfortable adults. This truck prioritizes cargo space to a much greater degree, having only a single seat, so it’s aggressively “single cab”.

        • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah I get that, but the wording of the title is weird right? They could have used different words making it a better sentence right? Or is it just me?

          “This single cab truck has the highest bed to cab ratio.”

          Like that for example?

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Don’t you hate it when you have a genius idea, only to find out someone else thought of it long ago? Nice try, Einstein. Back to the sandbox.

  • hakase@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    2 days ago

    It may be because a large enough load could quickly block the driver’s left-side mirror.

    Oooh, another thing is that a heavy enough load may imbalance the vehicle enough to make it unsafe on turns.

    Anyone see anything else?

    • chocrates@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, non uniform suspension or adaptive suspension might be important.

      Probably not a good idea for 70 miles per hour but it might be a kick ass farm truck

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        That was my first thought. Either the load will make it uneven, or the lack of load will. Also, very weird wind resistence at speed.

        But fine at low speed

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Large enough load would escape when braking. No wall up front. Add one and visibility goes to shit.

    • BeUnique@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Heavy enough people? Take a 300lb person in the front and a 200lb person in the back and you’re gonna have a bad time making a quick turn

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      My first thought was weight distribution, but I imagine there’s suspension technology these days to account for that.

    • pigup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      A enough load would block the entire left window. the driver would be unable to see to their left.