Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 年前Sorry for the inconveniencesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square65linkfedilinkarrow-up1722arrow-down111
arrow-up1711arrow-down1imageSorry for the inconveniencesh.itjust.worksSjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 年前message-square65linkfedilink
minus-squareSlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down3·2 年前Pretty much this size
minus-squareurinnerchild87@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 年前I think 2.5 inches would be closer to a soda can if we’re using references.
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 年前2.5" in diameter is just under a baseball (2.8").
minus-squareJohandea@feddit.nulinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·2 年前Can you please start using real units. Seriously.
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 年前It’s the same size as a cricket ball, 2.8".
minus-squarelolcatnip@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·2 年前No. 2.5" is in real units already. What’s your problem with size comparisons?
minus-squarehydrospanner@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·2 年前Relevant username. That thing is nowhere near 2.5" dia.
minus-squareSlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 年前I googled for 50 mm. That should be close enough.
minus-squareFilthyShrooms@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 年前2.5 inches is 635 mm. Thats much closer to 50 cm
minus-squareSnipingNinja@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 年前That doesn’t sound right to me. An inch has ~2.54 cm, so 2.5" should be 6.35 cm and a cm has 10mm, so that becomes 63.5mm
minus-squareSlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 年前1 inch is 25,4 mm, not 254 mm.
minus-squareFilthyShrooms@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 年前I am often incorrect. Today is one of those days
Pretty much this size
I think 2.5 inches would be closer to a soda can if we’re using references.
2.5" in diameter is just under a baseball (2.8").
Can you please start using real units. Seriously.
It’s the same size as a cricket ball, 2.8".
No. 2.5" is in real units already. What’s your problem with size comparisons?
They should just refer to the caliber
I fire 120 mm high-explosive rounds
Relevant username.
That thing is nowhere near 2.5" dia.
I googled for 50 mm. That should be close enough.
Relevant username
2.5 inches is 635 mm. Thats much closer to 50 cm
That doesn’t sound right to me. An inch has ~2.54 cm, so 2.5" should be 6.35 cm and a cm has 10mm, so that becomes 63.5mm
1 inch is 25,4 mm, not 254 mm.
I am often incorrect. Today is one of those days
Lol, 2.5 inches is over 2 feet?