Streaming prices are out of hand. What are cheaper alternatives?

  • citizensongbird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    How is this a surprise to anyone? They came to replace cable.

    No, you still don’t get it.

    THEY CAME TO REPLACE CABLE.

    • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 days ago

      At this point I’d think a good number of folks either don’t remember or simply never experienced cable/satellite TV.

      Hard to compare against something you’ve never experienced.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      a basic cable package in my city costs $100. A high end one costs $200.

      Netflix basic is 8 bucks, netflix premium is 25.

      • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        Plus the internet connection, which I get it, it’s currently a necessity, but at the time of cable TV, it didn’t represent an expense.

      • citizensongbird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        That’s exactly my point. Cable didn’t start off costing $100-$200. In the beginning it was a few bucks as an ad-free alternative to antenna TV. Then they raised prices, just a little at a time, over many years, as well as introduced ads. Sound familiar?

        I promise you, some day streaming will cost $100-$200, too. And people will pay it, just like your grandparents do today.

        I say again: streaming is here to REPLACE cable. You’re living in the golden age of low-cost entertainment and you don’t even know it.