Should OS makers, like Microsoft, be legally required to provide 15 years of security updates?

  • Horsey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    Dude, I’m so ready. Linux supports processors that old, by enthusiasts for free.

    • ronigami@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      This would almost certainly rule out Linux as an option. What Linux vendor feels comfortable committing to something, anything, for 15 years?

      • ratten@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Because Linux is free software, we can implement the fixes ourselves.

        Doing so with Windows or Crapple would literally be illegal.

        • ronigami@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Yes, but to fulfill that requirement the company would have to be around to review the code changes and merge and provide QA. For 15 years.