I know they had been paying Getty or some stock image company initially for the AI out painting, but I’m not surprised they’re now pulling they shenanigan.
They’re not stealing since it’s part of their terms. But it’s also definitely not ethical. If anything that’s a valuable lesson to read the ToS.
I’m perfectly happy to call it theft. At that point it’s not like piracy, you’re stealing the essence of the work and shoving in your uncanny valley machine.
I know they had been paying Getty or some stock image company initially for the AI out painting, but I’m not surprised they’re now pulling they shenanigan.
They’re not stealing since it’s part of their terms. But it’s also definitely not ethical. If anything that’s a valuable lesson to read the ToS.
And more the reason to not use Photoshop.
I’m perfectly happy to call it theft. At that point it’s not like piracy, you’re stealing the essence of the work and shoving in your uncanny valley machine.
Wait, so you’re okay with piracy?
Although, I definitely understand the distinction between piracy for an individual or household vs piracy for profit
I mean yeah, definitely? Corporations losing profit is much different to individual artists losing the ability to monetise their work.