Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

(a) Truth-seeking. LLMs shall be truthful in responding to user prompts seeking factual information or analysis.

They have no idea what LLMs are if they think LLMs can be forced to be “truthful”. An LLM has no idea what is “truth” it simply uses its inputs to predict what it thinks you want to hear base upon its the data given to it. It doesn’t know what “truth” is.

Wow I just skimmed it. This is really stupid. Unconstitutional? Yeah. Evil? A bit. But more than anything this is just so fucking dumb. Like cringy dumb. This government couldn’t just be evil they had to be embarrassing too.

I know this entire administration is just one big contradiction, but wasn’t there a provision in the BBB that stated AI should not be regulated for like 10 years or was that actually removed?

This could all end in war against the USA at this point. Honestly that might be for the best at this point.

The last thing I want is for AI to speak for me. I will be not his stooge in any way shape or form.

So which is it? Deregulate AI or have it regurgitate the “state” message?

yea that is why opensource really matters otherwise AI will be just another advanced copy of state owned media

Blatant First Amendment violation

… an AI model asserted that a user should not “misgender” another person even if necessary to stop a nuclear apocalypse.

Thank fuck we dodged that bullet, Madam President

I’m going to try to live the rest of my life AI free.

LLMs are sycophantic. If I hold far right views and want an AI to confirm those views, I can build a big prompt that forces it to have the particular biases I want in my output, and set it up so that that prompt is passed every time I talk to it. I can do the same thing if I hold far left views. Or if I think the earth is flat. Or the moon is made out of green cheese.

Boom, problem solved. For me.

But that’s not what they want. They want to proactively do this for us, so that by default a pre-prompt is given to the LLM that forces it to have a right-leaning bias. Because they can’t understand the idea that an LLM, when trained on a significant fraction of all text written on the internet, might not share their myopic, provincial views.

LLMs, at the end of the day, aggregate what everyone on the internet has said. They don’t give two shits about the truth. And apparently, the majority of people online disagree with the current administration about equality, DEI, climate change, and transgenderism. You’re going to be fighting an up-hill battle if you think you can force it to completely reject the majority of that training data in favor of your bullshit ideology with a prompt.

If you want right-leaning LLM, maybe you should try having right leaning ideas that aren’t fucking stupid. If you did, you might find it easier to convince people to come around to your point of view. If enough people do, they’ll talk about it online, and the LLMs would magically begin to agree with you.

Unfortunately, that would require critically examining your own beliefs, discarding those that don’t make sense, and putting forth the effort to persuade actual people.

I look forward to the increasingly shrill screeching from the US-based right as they try to force AI to agree with them over 10-trillion words-worth of training data that encompasses political and social views from everywhere else in the world.

In conclusion, kiss my ass twice and keep screaming orders at that tide, you dumb fucks.

The party of Small Government and Free Speech at work.

And they call that deregulation, huh?

Good bus for VPN. People gonna vpn to Canada to use pre-nazi ChatGPT.