You’re an idiot. You have the freedom to speak in whatever way you want. You do not have the freedom from the consequences of misusing that very same speech.
In exactly the same way you have the right to bear arms but do not have the right to use those arms to attack your fellow citizen.
Free speech means freedom from legal consequences. If it’s a crime to say a thing, and there is a penalty for saying them, then it’s a misnomer to call it free speech.
That’s where you’ve got this whole concept fucked up. You can say whatever you want. You cannot say whatever you want in any manner that you want. It’s ALL about time, place, and manner. Time, place, and manner restrictions have always and will always be a part of the freedom of speech.
BOMB! THERE’S A BOMB ON THE PLANE THAT’S GOING TO EXPLODE IN MINUTES!
That would certainly test the free speech part
No, it wouldn’t.
Jesus Christ has no one taken a civics class or studied how your government works?
Free speech limitations are clearly set with multiple case precedent. You would be arrested, convicted, and banned from ever flying. Full stop.
Well then that’s not free speech. If there are any limitations, even sensible ones, it needs a different name. Like, limited speech for example
You’re an idiot. You have the freedom to speak in whatever way you want. You do not have the freedom from the consequences of misusing that very same speech.
In exactly the same way you have the right to bear arms but do not have the right to use those arms to attack your fellow citizen.
Free speech means freedom from legal consequences. If it’s a crime to say a thing, and there is a penalty for saying them, then it’s a misnomer to call it free speech.
That’s where you’ve got this whole concept fucked up. You can say whatever you want. You cannot say whatever you want in any manner that you want. It’s ALL about time, place, and manner. Time, place, and manner restrictions have always and will always be a part of the freedom of speech.