Osso

Yes, for me it’s very common and very easy not to notice too

I’ve had a similar surgery last August. My mind was going wild about the procedure, but my psychologist suggested I look into it, and I found it was much simpler than I expected, which eased a bit the anxiety. The recovery was a bit slow, but I did some things on my throat as well, which come with eating restrictions. The recovery for the nose part was uneventful.

To be honest, I love being a part of a group. I even crave it, sometimes. The hard part is finding an appropriate group, and the harder part is to feel comfortable in it.

On Boost it shows correctly as well

Don’t even get me started on replying to audio messages

As far as I understand, tit for tat will lose most individual duels. But it does cooperate a lot and makes lots of points as a whole. Proactive strategies win more, but they do not cooperate a lot (especially against each other), and in the end, they make fewer points. In real life, annihilating someone would make others not want to cooperate with you. So the options would be either to annihilate everyone or no one.

A very late comment for you

Two come to mind easily:

https://youtu.be/djuLTycQICE?si=G4hrdKs0AANTXBfn

Fitz and the Tantrums - The Walker

Between “Can’t keep up with my rhythm” and “I walk to the sound of my own drum” this song feels very empowering for me at times.

https://youtu.be/jfLpVbu5svQ?si=FHJ-n510Hr4jZWWX

Machine Gun Kelly - bloody valentine

The overcommitment to the relationship in his head and being sad after being overstimulated is very relatable as well.

Yeah, I definitely don’t listen to my favorite song all the time. When I find a song I like, though, I usually listen to it endlessly (at least until I move on to another song).

I would keep it. I love the way I think differently, and I am at a point where I think that if I do not fit somewhere, other people should work more to accommodate things I do differently (because I do work a lot to be sociable).

Just to add another interpretation (that’s not exactly correct, but might rest your mind a little bit): when you measure a single particle (or molecule) it’s kind of hard to predict the outcome - so it’s useful to think of particles having two states (or molecules having more vibrational states, for instance). When you add a lot of particles or molecules together, the population behavior gets a lot more predictable, and this situation is closer to what we are used to in the real world, that’s one of the reasons quantum mechanics feels unnatural. It’s also somewhat similar to how a single person can be different and unpredictable, but marketing can easily get insights from large populations. Imagine studying a million people and figuring out 0.5% of them are blonde and have AB+ blood type. When you look at this, you might ask what does 0.5% of people even mean: it’s only 1 in 200, but depending on how you think about it, it looks very weird - what does half person even mean in the real world? In the end, it’s more a matter of how we interpret things, and trying to compare quantum behavior with real-world analogies will always be weird.

Jesus! Is this an autistic trait? I’m undiagnosed, but it happens with me so so often

I had the same feeling reading the comments in a reddit post that reached All, the happiness of finally being part of a group without making a huge effort is amazing

I ended up replying to the original comment, but your translation to English made me realize that in Portuguese we commonly say “O que que é isso?” which is basically “qu’est-ce-que c’est?”

In Portuguese we actually can say “O que é isso?”, basically the same as in Spanish, but I’d say I use more commonly “O que que é isso?”, which seems closer to French version. Funny, had never thought about it like that.

In Portuguese is “Noventa” also

YES, YES, WE ARE ALL REAL FELLOW HUMANS HERE

Hey, thank you! I love measuring things too and it never occurred to me to carry a measure tape with me, such a great idea

I’ll definitely look into it, thank you!