It’s mostly about consent. We can debate when and where sentience begins, but it begins somewhere and vegans hold a moral philosophy that says using another sentient being’s work product or body without their consent is immoral.

Note that I am not vegan myself but understand, if not agree with, their moral position.

And as another reply said, most vegans recognize it as a “best effort” philosophy, as they appreciate the impracticality of an absolutist stance. They are focused on “harm reduction”.

blue = azul

bluey = azula

Site-to-site and individual client setups are not mutually exclusive. They can co-exist.

I have Wireguard on both my phone and laptop - and tailscale should work the same way - which I only activate when I’m away from my home network.

You could even set it up where each “roaming” device is always connected to their “home” network by VPN, which uses site-to-site to further route the traffic where it needs to go.

I recommend looking into setting up site-to-site VPN configurations between routers at each location. I have this set up between my home network and my parents’ network.

Once you have it properly configured you can simply have the router itself handle routing of specific traffic over the VPN connection, instead of needing each device to connect to the VPN individually.

it’s a bit more complicated to set up and maintain but not anything outrageously complex, and absolutely worth it for your use case IMO

…ngl I’ve been looking for a campaign to join 0_o Just saying :D

ah you’re right, I misread. correcting…

Protect that DM at all costs. They truly understand what it means to create a D&D campaign

Truly worthy of GotY

This is missing one step. Corrected timeline is here: https://piefed.social/comment/8584030

deleted by creator

• Trump admin sends national guard
• State sues to stop the troops from being sent
• Court grants a temporary block on sending troops pending a final determination
• Trump admin asks 9th Circuit to intervene and block the ruling that prevented them from sending troops, arguing that they needed to send 25% of all Federal Protection Service agents to safeguard ICE, which left others vulnerable, and that the national guard deployment would alleviate that problem.
• Based partially on this 25% stat, 9th Circuit agrees to block the lower court’s temporary order preventing troops from being sent to Oregon. This did not stop the lawsuit, but did allow the troops to be sent while the lawsuit proceeded
• Plaintiffs (state of Oregon) informed the 9th Circuit that the number of FPS agents sent at a single time was not 25% (actually closer to 7%), and requests that their decision be reversed. 9th Circuit reviews the situation and agrees, reinstating the temporary order that prevents the Trump admin from sending troops to Oregon

This sounds an awful lot like a story Gary made up to cover for his mistake /s

This implies the existence of incompetent dragons and I really want my DM to have us fight one

Seasons don’t fear the Raven Queen

It’s called “Call of Cthulhu”, not “Sighting of Cthulhu”, forehead

get out of here with your soros-funded shill story you damn communist hippie

/s

^if I could make this bigger I would

The problem isn’t the concept of qualified immunity, it’s the implementation and application.

You realize this is the exception in the US, not the rule, right?

oh no, it’s someone with two accounts on two of the largest servers for the two main pieces of software mimicking Reddit! what a scandal!

Can’t attack my argument so you attack a fictitious version of me instead. You clearly hold the moral high ground here /s

Also lmao at “85% of the world supports public executions and beheadings” you absolute psychopath xD