Please don’t mix chilli peppers with anti-inflammatory drugs, they wreck your guts as it is lol.

It also matches preference of general public so one would say that algorithm works as expected?

If something is public domain then it’s incompatible with copyleft licenses, like GPL under which Linux is licensed.

Linux team is trolling AI boosters who can’t certify their code is clean unless they trained models themselves.

Not only copyright is dead but so is licensing of things in general. This means there’ll be less original work from both commercial and non-commercial projects. Commercially there won’t be ways to profit so why bother. On the libre licensing front why would you contribute code to GPL licensed projects or release art under Creative Commons if it’s going to be license washed anyway?

Anthropic claims that. Sucks for them now, but boy did it do wonders for their marketing.

It is Anthropic’s whole business model though.

What if license and copyright was washed by using an LLM to translate Claude into another language?

Either way, Claude can’t be copyrighted because it’s a product of an LLM.

I actually downloaded the PS3 version of DNF off Myrient so I can vouch that’s not it 👀

I’m not worried about backups since all of Myrient content originated elsewhere. The true value of Myrient was how accessible and fast it was and that’s the hard part that this project hasn’t demonstrated yet.

Are they pirates if they paid for it? Police working on behalf of corpos for chilling effect. I’m paying for YouTube and watch pirated content hosted there all the time.

Yeah, fair use apparently doesn’t work the same way in France. Regardless of this consumers can still claim they thought they were purchasing a legitimate product. Do you check if YouTube has rights to videos you’re watching there? Am I liable for watching Star Wars Holiday Special on Youtube?

Given that everyone is innocent until proven guilty, an excuse can be all it takes sometimes, especially in a civil suit.

Sure, but the users of the service could also claim they got scammed with a counterfeit product. Those selling the service are the only ones worth pursuing from the practical and ethical standpoint.

I never realised how things are different in Poland when it comes to this. Around here you’d get away with downloading pretty much anything except software which is explicitly excluded from our fair use laws. You can share full copies of audio, video and text among close group of friends / relatives legally so if persecution happens it’s usually against those uploading torrents or selling piracy services where it’s easy to make a case that it wasn’t fair use.

It might be called something different but without fair use principles you wouldn’t be able to quote, review or parody a movie. This intent isn’t known by the persecutors ahead of time, hence what they’re doing is rather overzealous (an euphemism for police working for corpos).

It never ceases me to amaze me there are countries that try to go after those downloading since it’s much harder to determine if it was done within fair use boundaries.

This YouTube playlist has visualisations of how this works. It’s pretty neat.

Wydaje mi się, że wszyscy ignorują jakie konsekwencje miałoby zostanie zdoxowanym dla osoby prowadzącej Archive.today. Dożywotnie więzienie i/lub niewypłacalny dług. Ja też bym stosował ciosy poniżej pasa w swojej własnej obronie. Wydaje mi się, że to nie ja kieruję się tutaj emocjami, a osoby stające w obronie chujka, bo jest trans.

Na czym polega ta manipulacja? Wydaje mi się, że gdyby mówić wprost, to by już nie brzmiało tak sensacyjnie. Ta trans osoba nie jest atakowana za bycie trans nawet jeśli finalnie zostało to użyte przeciwko niej, a za to, że próbowała kogoś zdoxować.

To wygląda na złośliwy deadnaming osoby, która doxowała autora archive.today. To kwestie personalne, które nie dotyczą 99.99% użytkowników. Sprzedawanie tego jako bliżej nieokreślone manipulowanie treściami jest robione w tak samo złej wierze.