That’s because he is not the authoritarian. He’ll be dead soon enough. He’s installing the authoritarian regime for the techbros. The technautocracy is being born in front of our very eyes.

And it will work perfectly because when he’s dead, we will mistake his absence for a return to normal.

He was installed by hacked election machines, hacked by the same people who donated to his inauguration fund. What do you think they are buying?

I don’t like to talk about it

This person codes

This really has nothing to do with the Epstein Files. I wish he would stay on message. It would be better for his political authoritarian career.

Cool fact. Next time I get mauled by one I’ll just taunt them by calling them hairy zebras!

I don’t understand. What do homeless people have to do with the Epstein Files?

On the 17th of September last year?

What a coinkidink!

I just predicted this morning that the way things are going his and his billionaire friend’s heads will be on pikes before the end of the decade

It will be declared an international monument that will be visited by schools for decades to come to learn about the importance of regular class wars to keep the parasites in check in a society.

I don’t believe it, you actually got the date notation right this today!

I’m a bit baffled at how many people are misunderstanding my post.

This is not instance related. This is just an additional NSFW type of filter. Please reread the OP or my other comments.

Sorry didn’t see I was on .ml

Thanks for duding me

You have not read or don’t understand the OP. This is about communities like my example in the OP, which many would not consider NSFW, but is on the touchy side of a bunch of other people. The communities don’t want the NSFW tag, but the users who want the ability to filter out the soft NSFW stuff.

Mate no. the UK ban did not originate from a federated open source community implementing filter systems.

Stop spreading absolute panic bullshit like this.

I would say, show me historic proof, but I doubt you’re that type of person.

Ok, I hear you. But as I said, it’s just adding filter options to those snowflakes like me, while not changing a single pixel for those like yourself.

Allowing superior UX for more people is how you make the internet better.

Nobody is advocating for a ban, nor can or will this be used as a first step towards one.

I think you just want to win arguments of theoretical concepts.

We both want the USA to self implode. That’s the common ground I’ll remember from this little interaction.

Imperialism never needed justification. It’s imperial. Let me know if you need a hand climbing out of your rabbit hole.

Argument 1: nobody else has it so why should we? Because we are new, the next step - we improve what needs to be done better.

Argument 2: reddit is full of porn… see above. We can make it better, at very little cost to anyone.

Argument 3 is undermining your first 2, but I agree. This would cause a few instances to become very popular and render the concept of federation unnecessary.

I don’t understand how a bunch of people here are basically say /all is a sewer, accept it.

I’m say it is not and doesn’t have to be. It is a place for discovery, and there is a way to make that more pleasant. Another commenter said an AI filter would also be good.

All I am suggesting is In addition to having the Fediverse allowing posts and communities to be marked NSFW, to allow for more filters. One filter like what I am suggesting could be a snowflake or FamFriendly filter which removes suggestive, soft porn or racy or soft gore stuff. Another could be AI which removes synthetically generated content.

How anyone can be against that is beyond me. I’m not asking for these things to be turned on by default, or to shove it down people’s throats. By default /all would still be the same

I understand NSFW and FamilyFriendly are blurry concepts. It is still up to the post OPs, community creators, moderators and instance administrators to use these properly.

?

How does this… Did you…

I’ve responded to the top comment to address the flaws in that argument.

I’ve responded to the top comment to address the flaws in that argument.

I’ve responded to the top comment to address the flaws in that argument.