

They’re building those underground now. https://mindev.gov.ua/en/news/do-kintsia-roku-bude-pobudovano-blyzko-200-pidzemnykh-shkil-oleksii-kuleba
They’re building those underground now. https://mindev.gov.ua/en/news/do-kintsia-roku-bude-pobudovano-blyzko-200-pidzemnykh-shkil-oleksii-kuleba
I believe your argument is an example of whataboutism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism
While you’re not wrong that people in general tend to care more about matters directly affecting them, this fact is simply not relevant to the original fact that peace for ruZZia can only mean their complete victory and genocide for Ukrainians.
Good thing this is not true.
You’re probably referring to ruzzia having three times more people than Ukraine. There are several factors why this is not as important as it might seem.
First is that ruzzia is attacking and the attacking side usually sustains 1:3 loss ratio. Second is that their approach was always to disregard their own, so the ratio is at least 1:5, likely even worse. And third, is that despite they have 140 million people, after you deduct women, children, old and sick, and ruzzian tooth to tail ratio of 1:1, you end up with the maximum army of 5 million.
And they already lost 20%. And some of those 20% were actually trained. And men that are fit for army are also for for work.
Which all basically means that if the sanctions pressure is kept, if Ukraine has enough ammunition (and they claim 30% is already made domestically) and as long as Ukraine keeps the loss ratio in its favour, ruzzia will simply implode.
Somebody calculated that at the current “advance” speed, ruzzia will need 140 years to occupy Ukraine. If Ukraine keeps doing what it’s doing, it needs maybe two.
It’s not going to be nice two years, but with a little support, Ukraine is winning and will win.
They started spending that money after starting the war, so it’s use is related to the war in question. Thus, when they will run out, whatever they were paying for (war related) will stop getting money.
It might not be a direct financing of the battlefield activities, but while the victory will be in the battlefield, the biggest chunk of the battle actually happens in preparation and logistics.
In other words, I’m hopeful that this will have a major impact on the invader’s ability to cause harm.
It would be 9 years, if only one linear factor was at play.
I believe it’s multiple factors, though.
One is that every plane taken out had its share of “work”, which is now distributed across the remaining ones. Which means they get worn out a little faster. Similar to how they have to cannibalise parts from one civilian aircraft to repair another.
Then I’m going they cannot maintain the usual production speed because if the sanctions. Add to that an increased need to repair since the plains are more heavily used. And I’d guess that repairs are fine at the same facility that produces them, this also reducing production speed.
In other words, I think it’s about snowballing and at this rate it could be way less than nine years.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-34
Since 2006 they’ve built 150 units. That’s 8 units a year. Some were sold, some got lost.
As of 20 May 2023, there have been 20 visually confirmed cases of Su-34s being lost, damaged or abandoned by Russian forces since the start of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. 23 now, apparently.
At their price, with sanctions, with wear of the remaining ones, at this rate, they might not have any left very soon.
There are other ways of passive or active resistance that is not a direct confrontation.
In the end, it’s still a choice, I’m afraid.
Forced or obeying orders? There’s a difference, you know.
i speak Ukrainian (and, ugh, the moscovite too), i’ll be happy to help, but i cannot promise a consistent and dedicated commitment.
I think that having difficulty noticing tiredness, exhaustion or hunger is a major symptom of ADHD. Do discuss this with your doctor, your dose might be not yet right.