That’s a good point. I’ve been thinking of it as a natural progression of the anti net neutrality/“protect the children” pushes we’ve been seeing in the states. Tbh I thought it seemed more in character for a government like the UK.

I see the parallels, but is it really causal? I feel like this was going to happen given the state of net neutrality in general with or without Gaza.

I haven’t looked at the article yet and only superficially poked around with I2P, but I think the idea is that user adoption is the key to better speeds and reliability given the P2P nature. That said, I found it to be daunting as well just getting into it.

Privacy and security in general are like that for me because a lot of the pitfalls come with how you use the tech and not just the structures they provide.

I think the reflex naturally makes sense, but from the people I personally know to be outspoken and definitionally feminist, it’s more like calling yourself a feminist says you explicitly side with the feminist cause. Sort of like saying you’re anti-racist rather than identifying as someone lacking racism, which is actually a farce when we’re all biased.

But I think the idea is that men should get the same lenience, i.e. just-feeling-wrecked-leave rather than menstrual-leave. The difference in having a baby should be that one needs medical leave too, in my mind.

I’d guess it’s to point out the fact that it’s developed under the guise of social liberty, but it isn’t a well defined term. Conservatives and neoliberals alike regard the views as liberal in America for some reason. In my mind the word helps distinguish it from liberal ideology by tacking on a modifier that can’t be equated to liberalism per se.

Neoliberalism fights for a semblance of democracy that favors economic, corporate freedom over personal liberties and the inherent human value we both care about.

I’m not attacking you or saying you’re wrong for how you see things. Sometimes the memes are just a way to communicate and normalize human existence. Social bias is social bias no matter who it’s against, why it’s against them, or to what degree. It’s a slippery slope to considering others to be worth less for the ways that they are.

You’re misunderstanding. I said neoliberal for a reason. I wouldn’t call either party liberal, and the issue I have is labeling them as such.

You do know mentally (and physically) “ill/disabled” are and have always been the next in line, right?

And yes, it’s largely things that are actually pretty normal and human in and of themselves. Just not normal enough.

Do you think neoliberals would do that?

I’ve sort of always read that way, inner voice and all. When I learned that really fast readers figure out how to ignore that, or do it naturally, my mind was blown.

Oddly enough, I find myself processing text with a regular font in both ways from time to time. Sometimes it flows like I’m reading half of the words but still absorbing every bit. Other times I notice the end of a paragraph and can’t tell you what I just read.

'member when we thought “grab em by the pussy” would definitely do the trick and open some eyes? I… Yeah I totally thought that at the time…

Good thing I checked the comments before posting the Uhm Ackshually

'23 is late enough, but it should be peppered with comments overwritten by 60 random words, just to make it worse

I didn’t know our very own seahorse was a Lemmy OG. But uh, yeah, we should be thanking you!

There’s always been something about Midwest vibes for me, so I’m glad we can all show up and have a flourishing instance. It’s still so wild that we have some top comms on here!

Finsexual

200% blahaj

Simply needing shelter

He’s been ashing right on the keys, the rat bastard