because of all the socialist propaganda in it?
- 0 Posts
- 81 Comments
there is plenty open source software, that you can buy. There are many modes:
- you buy the support (redhead)
- you buy the long-term-support (ubuntu)
- you pay for backports to old releases (keycloak iirc)
- there is a open source version, and you can pay for enterprise features and hosting (gitlab)
- there is an open source version, and you pay for customization (star office, iirc)
and my personal favorit:
- you pay a random developer to submit pullrequests for bugs that are relevant to you
bort@feddit.deto Technology@lemmy.world•Why It Was Almost Impossible to Make the Blue LEDEnglish5·2 years agofull-spectrum lighting
this doesn’t sound true.
iirc full spectrum means “every wavelength” (like sunlight) and not just “3 wavelengths that add up to white”.
bort@feddit.deto Technology@lemmy.world•Sony is erasing digital libraries that were supposed to be accessible “forever”English2611·2 years agoYou vote with your wallets. Each time you buy a phone without SD cart, you are submitting a ballot.
Seriously. phones are 99% identical anyways. It’s not so hard to filter for the 2-3 criteria you actually care about.
bort@feddit.deto Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•Why do companies love chrome so much?English3·2 years agois this true?
bort@feddit.deto Technology@lemmy.world•Skyrocketing bluesky engagement since opening to the publicEnglish82·2 years agooh nice. If this trend continues, they will be by 4 million tommorrow and 20 million next week and by summer every human on earth will have an account.
I think many of them simply got converted to sub ways and such.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_suburban_and_commuter_rail_systems
Fraud is still fraud, even if they call it something else.
The consumer was led to believe, they could access the media for a long time. The time was abruptly cut short. The consumer did not get what they were led to believe. It’s fraud.
It’s like every other (consumer-)fraud before: they can write in the fine print whatever they want.
I am not saying that this argument will definitely hold up in court. I just want to point out, that it’s not so clear-cut as you are presenting it.
tiny bit of a germaphobe
iirc salt is a has antimicrobial properties. So if anything, then licking that salt, will reduce the germs in your mouth. So a true germaphobe would be all over that lamp
are you sure you don’t want to share an indirect kiss with all her past tinder dates?
not watching this one, because I can’t relate to the cuteness or gayness
does not compute.
Is that one of these sentences, that are grammatically correct, but semantically nonsense? like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colorless_green_ideas_sleep_furiously
top 26: https://live.staticflickr.com/5551/32212605922_ce300694e5_o.jpg
all of them: https://decolonialatlas.files.wordpress.com/2017/04/world-watersheds.png
too bad they aren’t ranked by size. Also not as pretty as the OP.
eurasia, are you even trying?
linksextrem würde ich sagen.
Das was der Jesus da gesagt haben soll, klingt für mich schon stark nach Sozialismus.
It is blatant plagiarism
yes, and a solution could have been to cite sources.
This was no innocent mistake of forgetting to list a source
I don’t think, that not-citing-sources is an innocent mistake.
Watch the hbomberguy video segment about it, it paints a very clear picture
I did. I does paint a very colorful picture. Full of opinion and sarcasm and rhethoric.
Here is a rule-of-thumb to decide if an argument was convincing because it had good content, or because it was well written: If the content was good, it will be easy for you explain to a 3rd party. If only the presentation was good, then you will have a hard time convincing others.
guy covers historical event doesn’t rewrite history, instead takes what someone else has written about event doesn’t use own fotos, uses someone elses foto instead makes mistakes
I am not saying this is a big nothing burger, but his only real mistakes was not to list his sources.
evolution could happen in jumps. How often that happens is debatable.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punctuated_equilibrium