I don’t think you can call something that can be shut down by a single company “global internet”
I have problems with the satellites sure, but fundamentally the whole premise is flawed.
Also spacex isn’t exactly doing great ok engineering compared to ULA and other industry leaders. Feels a bit weird to put them on a pedestal.
What didn’t make sense about his point?
Poe’s law strikes again
Sorry I missed that, too many polarising people around.
Have a good one
Both can be bad, both are worth talking about.
Markov Babble?
Tbh zig is as chill as an iceberg compared to rust! I really appreciate the mindset of “c with rough edges removed” that zig promotes. Already using it in our companies stm32 projects
Haha true that, though if I’m not mistaken a large part of the engineering of molten salt reactors is dealing with the salt…man I want the cool tech to be rolled out
Salt is absolutely terrible for any equipment involved in power generation. You’re better off with a power plant and a separate desalination plant than trying to use one for both
But you’re right, cheap energy will help immensely with this
Both are the bad guys, not either.
Digital hardware, mainly top-level design in verilog and associated checks using python/perl (sad)
Right now working on a GPU which is fun!
Out of responses?
Your (very condescending) point was that “we” say things in a specific way and that should be aligned with how it’s written.
No need to lash out at Britain for giving a counterexample in the English speaking world.
Have a good day!
Thanks! As a hardware guy it’ll be a long time before I do anything with this information. Nice to hear the opinions of actual Devs.
Being honest, I’m an outsider looking in. Most likely these things are solved problems, but alternates are always interesting to hear insider opinions on.
Sounds like it’s developer experience Vs required post processing in this case, which is a reasonable tradeoff to think about
It’s Southampton