ISPs putting you behind NAT is not cozy.
They charge extra for a feature called “static IP”. But the IP address not being static is not the issue, for me at least. You could host stuff with a dynamic IP back in 2000s/2010s. But no, now you get to share the same IPv4 address with a bunch of other households, unless you pay extra.
/64
That’s not an address, that’s a whole fucking subnet consisting of 2^64 different addresses. ☝️🤓
Love to see him calling his supporters morons.
In typical C fashion, there’s undefined behavior in turn_char_to_int. xD
So how does a claim regarding Russia’s technological capabilities relate to my original comment?
Your original comment literally calls Russia one of the world’s “most technologically prominent” country, stop trying to gaslight me.
leaders of two of the world’s most technologically prominent countries
Putin and Xi
Not even remotely related to the part I quoted and laughed at, but I’ll humour you.
It’s called deduction, you just need to use that gray matter of yours. Two, rather old, psychopaths muse about extending one’s lifetime. Could it be that they themselves have a vested interest in this? No, that must be a conspiracy theory by filthy liberals.
two of the world’s most technologically prominent countries
Russia
LMFAO. lemmy.ml users just can’t stop glazing autocracies, can they?
“Earlier, people rarely lived to 70, but these days at 70 you are still a child,” Xi told Putin according to the translator in Russian.
Hard to argue with that. Both of these cunts seem to lack any emotional intelligence whatsoever.
Oh wow, a security disaster. You know, you can temporarily escalate your privileges if you need to modify Program Files, right? It’s just one UAC prompt away.
I misremembered the whole thing. It was still related to cleaning up after a failure, but there was only one resource I had to deal with. That’s how it looks like:
sqlite3 *db;
int r;
r = sqlite3_open("./data.db", &db);
if (r) {
std::cerr << "Can't open the database: " << sqlite3_errmsg(db) << std::endl;
return r;
}
r = sqlite3_exec(db, "CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS foo(...);", nullptr, nullptr, nullptr);
if (r != SQLITE_OK) {
std::cerr << "Can't create a table called foo: " << sqlite3_errmsg(db) << std::endl;
goto out;
}
// a few more sqlite3_exec calls;
// some sqlite3_prepare_v2 calls combined with sqlite3_bind_* and sqlite3_step calls
// for repeated queries.
out:
sqlite3_close(db);
return r;
You’re describing Secure Boot.
Secure Boot is literally configurable. You can create your own key and sign whatever you want with it. See sbctl.
I mean, in C too.
I used it when I wrote some throwaway C++ code working with SQLite. Since it had no RAII (and I had no intention of writing my own wrapper), I had to manually cleanup multiple resources somehow. If at least one resource failed to initialize, I had to deinitialize the ones that didn’t fail. It was either goto or a bunch of flags to track what is initialized. goto looked more elegant.
May I suggest avoiding recursive functions where possible? They are usually the ones overflowing your stack, duh.
Ironic that you need a Google smartphone, isn’t it?
rabid commies
You’ve chosen the worst possible instance, LMAO.
Fun fact: the “Enshittification” article on Wikipedia has Reddit among the examples.
First time I’m hearing of the CQS. Wow, just wow. Dystopian shit.
New account experience on Reddit in 2025:
Fuck Steve Huffman and fuck his enshittified site.
Don’t give a shit about live service multiplayer PvP-games infested with FOMO battle passes, I’m afraid.
I’m quite content with co-op and singleplayer games, thanks for worrying though.
Install, maybe. What about updates though? Do you plan to pull out
adbfor each and every one of them? Or would you rather keep using old, potentially insecure, versions?