I think the line (while the details may be certainly difficult) is along “are you making the existing image/story clearer or are you changing the narrative of the media?
When the story you get from the image changes, then you’ve crossed the line.
That’s a great example of what goes wrong, and it was amazing to get the news on it.
“By the way, you’re now an invading force, surprise!”
It has a very “zap Brannigan” feel to it
I think that’s disingenuous…
There’s a clear difference between a processing mistake and an intentional addition. That’s a fairly clear line. Grain on a photo is not the same as making you look like a human head on a shark’s body.
Yes, no photo is 100% accurate, just as no statement will ever capture an incident perfectly. That doesn’t mean there’s no such thing as lying.
There is definitely a line.
Is the tech trying to make the photo more accurate, or change the narrative?
Sure, there’s some tech that’s awkwardly in the middle, like skin smoothing, but we don’t NEED that, and it’s not directly changing the narrative of the story, unless you’re selling acne medication.
Agreed. You’ll have to prove that the person knows (or reasonably should have known) that his words were going to cause great harm to someone. Not unlike telling someone to “kill themselves” where we already have some established laws/rules etc…
The only sensible take.
Sadly I think that allowing people to spread lies is a necessity. Yelling “fire” in a crowded theatre clearly is over the line….
Perhaps the line is at misinformation that is intended to do direct harm?
So illegal to say “drink bleach” but not illegal to say “Covid is a hoax”
I’m not sure, but that’s the best line in the sand I can think of without giving too much power to governments, or allowing too much harm from a lie.
Sure, but no plane within about 2km is going to stay in the sky….
The em pulse, the shockwave, the heat….
Aim is for handguns, this thing might take yourself out if you’re not careful.
Mostly a “cost” basis, but it’s an assumption for the Google assistant for sure. Siri I’ve tested.
It varies some….
Most of it is remote, however “Siri” actually does a lot locally, and I assume Google assistant does too.
Those are likely the only two that do much locally, everyone else does it all remotely.
The problem is that they combined three different pieces of software into one cheaply.
So it’s big, clunky and doesn’t often work.
Apparently they are trying to fix it, but we will see
Everybody is taking the stupid bait and arguing the wrong thing.
Companies don’t think it makes them more efficient, they don’t care about culture much, but they do care about layoffs.
This is stealth layoffs. You get x% of people to outright quit because of the mandate. Another y% you can “fire” for non compliance with the “return to office”
And then your layoff is a TON cheaper because none of those groups require severance, and it plays better with everyone that still works at the company because the layoff is smaller or non existent.
Get a decent machine and run true as scale.
All of these things can be installed as helm/k8s “apps” and they almost self configure.
They update aswell.
It’s spectacular.
Then throw drives at it.
I have one “pool” of storage that’s a raid 10 for things I care about and then a giant zfs “jbod “ that has no backups for just mass storage of things that I don’t really care about.
Fair. Teams suck.
I mean that’s not really any different from slack
I felt so lied to when I left high school, having been told my entire life that people eventually grow up…. And now I’m 40ish and they really don’t.
The awful things haven’t happened to most people yet
Most people don’t have any concept why their privacy matters.
And until something awful happens to them, they aren’t interested in learning it either.
“Do not ride the bomb”
I’d trust the “non officers” more than the officers in most scenarios.
Also an excellent point
I can concede to that… there will be some grey area, but the idea that “there is no true photo” or “there is no truth” feels wrong.