BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 years agoRule no longer accepting the things I cannot change. I am changing the things I cannot accept.lemmy.tfimagemessage-square5linkfedilinkarrow-up149arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up149arrow-down1imageRule no longer accepting the things I cannot change. I am changing the things I cannot accept.lemmy.tfBartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square5linkfedilinkfile-text
I need to quit coming to this community today so I can quit posting, I’m running out of things to post!
minus-squareCustoslibera@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·2 years agoLabels like feminism can become counterproductive when used as an insult I.e. that’s anti feminist!!! Instead we should use Feminism as a lens to view other social issues to reveal solidarity between discriminated groups. The final line is the most important: When one group is discriminated against there necessarily must be other groups also discriminated against This argument is closely related to Intersectionality. Read Crenshaw’s paper on intersectionality for further information.
minus-squareBartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tfOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 years agoPerfectly summarized, thanks!
minus-squaremoshtradamus666@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoOk, but what about that no longer accepting things part? Or abolition of feminism? (did I get that wrong?)
minus-squareCustoslibera@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years ago‘Abolition. Feminism. Now.’ Is the title of the book OP is talking about. ‘No long accepting the things I can’t change’ is OP saying they are taking an activist stance on this/other issues.
Labels like feminism can become counterproductive when used as an insult I.e. that’s anti feminist!!!
Instead we should use Feminism as a lens to view other social issues to reveal solidarity between discriminated groups.
The final line is the most important:
When one group is discriminated against there necessarily must be other groups also discriminated against
This argument is closely related to Intersectionality. Read Crenshaw’s paper on intersectionality for further information.
Perfectly summarized, thanks!
Ok, but what about that no longer accepting things part? Or abolition of feminism? (did I get that wrong?)
‘Abolition. Feminism. Now.’
Is the title of the book OP is talking about.
‘No long accepting the things I can’t change’ is OP saying they are taking an activist stance on this/other issues.