• floofloof@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    I’m using it locally, with models my existing computer can handle. I think, but I’m not sure, that it’s better for the environment than buying into some massive model hosted in a data centre. And I don’t want to lose my skills so I still try to do as much as I can without calling on it.

    • HoloPengin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      29 days ago

      I will say that using a super efficient cloud model (deepseek for me, v4 flash is very cheap) is probably more efficient than using a local model in most cases, especially if you need strong capabilities. The question is whether your own grid or the provider’s grid is more environmentally friendly (hint: china’s energy mix is about 50% fossil fuels while the US’s mix is around 75% fossil fuels overall)

      Training is of course expensive still, but Chinese labs have all but caught up to US labs despite much lower compute resources being available to them.

      • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        That’s a fair point. Where I am is about 28% fossil fuels I believe, so it’s a slightly different calculation.

      • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        No, and I do understand that training is the most energy-intensive part of the process. I don’t know how exactly it divides up: how much of the work of massive data centres is training and how much is running people’s queries on finished models.