• Zarobi@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    23 days ago

    No worries, it’s more of a gut feeling than anything specific. I’m not really looking at the picture with a microscope. It’s more, immediately when I see the overall image I’m like, that’s A.I. I almost feel a twinge of sadness or disappointment when I see A.I. images now, like I’d rather there be no image at all lol

    • Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 days ago

      Fair, still thank you for explaining.

      Though you’re not the first person to refer to it as a sort of a gut feeling. There was some thread few weeks ago where someone posted a link to a simple test where there were 20 random pictures and had to detect which ones were AI which ones were real. Most people did say that it was similarly a gut feeling. That gives me an idea and a direction to search.

      • Zarobi@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        I just looked that up because it seemed interesting. It was a fun little game where you have to choose out of two images. It was a lot harder though because it was out of context and photorealistic. I find it much harder personally to identify photo realism A.I. unless it makes some glaring mistakes. Mostly it kind of looks “too perfect”. I ended up with 80% accuracy. I actually got more accurate when I got bored and chose within 2 seconds to get it over with lol, I was less accurate when I carefully zoomed in and took my time which was an interesting outcome. The cynical part of me wonders if the results of that game will be used to make even more convincing A.I.

        Link

        • Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 days ago

          That one is actually even better. The other one was in foreign language so i couldn’t understand the explanations of why some pictures were AI.

          Though it does have the same problem. There are only 2 options, so it’s possible to get 50% right by just randomly choosing. I could probably guess 3/10 pictures because those had untypically blurry background, but eventually got 6/10 correct. Though the blurry effect can be achieved in photography as well. So it was just guessing and figuring out the pattern for those pictures.

          Accuracy dropped to 45% if i continued.