Years after ripping stars to shreds, 24 black holes suddenly flared up with radio waves in inexplicable 'burping' bouts. Half of all star-killing black holes may experience the same.
It doesn’t say “sucked into a black hole” it says “destroyed by a black hole”. It’s about stars which are torn apart by a blackhole’s gravity but not sucked in.
The first sentence of the body text in the article:
“Up to half of the black holes that devour stars “burp up” their stellar remains years later.”
I recognize that its not an entire sun being sucked in at once and that the black holes presence alone destroys the sun but the parts that are left. Radiation and what not should still be attracted to the black hole and assumingly orbit around its gravity before gething devoured.
It cant burp something out that was never inside. Or maybe it does but those implications are even more bizar. If it was just “burping out” the surrounding star stuff it wouldn’t be called a burp but “pushed it away again.
It doesn’t say “sucked into a black hole” it says “destroyed by a black hole”. It’s about stars which are torn apart by a blackhole’s gravity but not sucked in.
The first sentence of the body text in the article:
“Up to half of the black holes that devour stars “burp up” their stellar remains years later.”
I recognize that its not an entire sun being sucked in at once and that the black holes presence alone destroys the sun but the parts that are left. Radiation and what not should still be attracted to the black hole and assumingly orbit around its gravity before gething devoured.
It cant burp something out that was never inside. Or maybe it does but those implications are even more bizar. If it was just “burping out” the surrounding star stuff it wouldn’t be called a burp but “pushed it away again.
How else am i to interpret this?
Maybe don’t read too much into the word choice of a non-technical article, and trust the actual astronomer discoverer talking about it?