‘It’s too powerful a technology’
  • sunbeam60@lemmy.oneEnglish
    14·
    3 years ago

    I’m so unbothered by this. It’s sad for illustrators (and I say this as somebody with a daughter who dreamt of becoming a concept artist, and now clearly understands this isn’t going to happen) but time marches on.

    We don’t have type setters any more. Cars have (largely) replaced horses.

    I think the best compromise I’ve heard is: AI generated output hasn’t been made by a human so can’t be copyrighted.

  • jet@hackertalks.comEnglish
    3·
    3 years ago

    I’m excited. As long as the output is curated. It allows small developers to make really exciting large projects. On a small budget. So we’re going to see a diversity in the creative space.

    And this isn’t going to kill artists. We’re going through a evolutionary period, where the source art is going to have some wonderful debate in the copyright scheme. But you still need a source concept in order to generate from.

  • stormesp@lemm.eeEnglish
    43·
    3 years ago

    I mean, in todays board game space with so many classics and new releases its cool to know two companies i dont have to bother buying games from

    • thorbot@lemmy.worldEnglish
      51·
      3 years ago

      Why do you care? Their lead artist is the one using the AI tools and it’s not just full generation of images, they use it as a reference tool and as a filler. People are up in arms about AI art but are oblivious to the context in which it’s used. If a studio fires their artists and only uses AI, sure, that’s a bad thing. That’s not even remotely what’s happening at Fryx Games.