SUMMARY

  • The EU has identified WhatsApp as a gatekeeper in the messaging industry and has given it a few months to enable interoperability with other apps.
  • The EU’s Digital Markets Act aims to promote fair competition and give consumers more options for alternative services.
  • WhatsApp has already begun working on interoperability with other apps, potentially allowing smaller players like Signal to compete more fairly.
  • elouboub@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Why is this being presented as “whatsapp will be the one and only” instead of “whatsapp won’t be the only option”? The DMA will users to install nearly any chat app and chat with users from another chat app.

  • kindenough@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    No it won’t.

    My sister was angered when I quit whatsapp (and facebook), asking me reasons why and if it was because I didn’t like her. Told her I like my privacy. Haven’t heard of her and a lot of other family since who only like to communicate through social media. Good.

    I like SMS and Signal, only people that care for me are using that because I asked them to.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m there with you on the ideals, after all here I am on Lemmy (and mastodon fwiw) with Reddit and TwitterX deleted.

      But, everybody I am close to in everyday life is a normie for lack of a better term. I don’t have to use Facebook regularly, for example, but there is a practical value to just having it available and checking notifications from time to time.

      Kind of like how I’m looking through some code in Linux at work today, but it’s running in a VM on my Microsoft/O365 equipped PC. Much like with Facebook, factors outside my control necessitate using it, so I accept it without stressing myself.

      I’m not trying to argue or convince you to change your ways though! FLOSS and privacy need awareness and advocacy, and therefore need strong outspoken supporters!

  • TheMadnessKing@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    The fact that iMessage got the exemptions underpins the entire act. I would any day switch to Signal, if there is 1:1 interoperability b/w the platforms.

    • jackoid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Probably won’t. WhatsApp is already huge. Threads was a new platform with artificially inflated user numbers.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I can’t wait for signal/session/simplex to be whatsapp compatible, but I’m not sure they can provided the e2ee gurantees since whatsapp is closed source.

    • Tywèle [she|her]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I fear that Signal won’t implement cross compatibility for WhatsApp since they already said that they are not a fan of potentially giving up E2EE to get it to work. And I can understand that but I still really would like to have the cross compatibility.

  • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Cool so I can decide to use Signal for privacy reasons and if the other party uses WhatsApp all my chats with them are read by Meta? What is the point?

    • ExLisper@linux.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      No, it’s still E2EE. Meta can’t read it as far as anyone knows. Meta will know that the other person has you in their contacts (they already know this) and that they are messaging you, that’s it.

      • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Meta writes the software that runs on the other end, and it’s closed source. Therefore for all we know, the message is end-to-end encrypted, and the moment it is decrypted on the other end Meta can send it back to their servers or use it for advertising. Unless the client at the end is open source and audited, E2E doesn’t mean much imo

          • bug@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            No I think you’ve missed their point. E2EE is end-to-end encryption, as in the message can’t be intercepted in the middle but it’s unencrypted at the end so you can read it. Because the WhatsApp app is closed-source you don’t know that it doesn’t immediately read the message and send the content to Facebook. It probably doesn’t, but it could! E2EE itself means that some third party can’t read your message in transit, though to be fair closed-source again means we just have to trust Facebook when they say WhatsApp uses E2EE.

      • archchan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        That’s not it. It’s E2EE but Meta gathers all the metadata from Whatsapp including who you contact, when, where, how large the messages are, what times you’re online and for how long, phone numbers, names etc. That’s plenty of info to create a profile on users and their connections with each other, as is Facebook’s MO.

  • Gamey@feddit.rocks
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I will finally be able to replace fucking SMS with a few people that simply won’t switch to Signal, I simply won’t use Whatsapp and that did cause some security issues till now!

  • CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Fuck that, fuck them they belong in the digital bin. I don’t want WhatsApp to be able to connect to Signal or anything else. Sounds like a gigantic security risk.

    • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is such a silly take. If you will talk to signal users, you won’t interact with this tech. If you want to talk to whatsapp users, right now yo need to have the app which is much worse!

    • Virkkunen@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      “I don’t want these Signal encrypted Matrix protocol messages on my Signal encrypted Matrix protocol messaging app, it’s a gigantic security risk”

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s weird. With every single app having a DM feature years before Whatsapp was even invented, with every single cell phone having email and SMS capabilities, and with a bunch of E2E encrypted apps already in service, why would I want to go back to Facebook’s ecosystem in 2023?

    • heird@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Whatsapp worked on iPhone, Android, Blackberry and even some old ass java phones

      They dominated the market in most countries or were close second to Messenger.

      Now they keep growing and it doesn’t give any chance to smaller better apps, this law makes it possible for you to use only signal but also chat to people that only use Whatsapp