The new junta’s move to cut ties with Niger’s former colonial power came amid threats of a military intervention by other West African states.

  • IchLiebeKetchup@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    If I was a Nigrien, I wouldn’t want to cooperate with the French either, after they exploited my country for decades.

    • dubbel@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      It’s “Nigerien”, and given that this decision was made by a unelected coup leader, I’d doubt you’d have much say in the matter as a Nigerien.

      • IchLiebeKetchup@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Well yes, but a coup needs popular support. If France paid a fair price for the nigerien uranium, the coup could maybe have been avoided in the first place and the chance of it succeeding would have been lower.

        • SireGautier@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          It’s not a question of cost at all. The Nigerien mines are no longer profitable, and their cost is well above the spot price. Orano is literally subsidizing them. There was a project to extend one of the three mines, but Orano was not very favorable. It was pushed through by the French and Niger states for more political reasons. To perpetuate an important part of its economy for Niger, and diversify its suppliers and keep strong commercial ties for France.

          As for uranium itself, French imports are not entirely destined for French consumption, far from it. France is a major uranium reprocessing country, so a significant proportion of its crude imports will be processed and re-exported.