• cayde6ml@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        How can you call the CPC revisionist? They are arguably the most orthodox (aside from mainly Cuba and Vietnam) of communist parties.

        • TrueStalinistPatriot@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Since when does Orthodox Marxism-Leninism mean operating a market economy? Since when does it mean having billionaires? Since when does it mean having private ownership of the means of production? Since when does it mean having the landlord class?

          https://www.theredspectre.com/against-dengism

          While China is obviously not as bad as the US or European social democracies it neither is a socialist state nor even a dictatorship of the proletariat (capital seeks to control every state it’s operating under!) how can you speak of a dictatorship of the working class when the CPC has bourgeois members within it?

      • Large Bullfrog@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        There are some revisionist elements in the CPC (I’m wary of Li Qiang for example) but I definitely wouldn’t call Xi a revisionist. His installment as General Secretary was more or less an orthodox marxist coup against revisionist Shanghai politicians.

        • cayde6ml@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m also curious where you see that Xi has mostly targeted revisionist Shanghai politicians.

          I’m not disagreeing with you, or not entirely, but I feel like you have something specific relating to this.

          • Large Bullfrog@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Just read up on Xi’s anti-corruption campaign, while it wasn’t explicitly an ideological purge it’s pretty clear that those that it removed weren’t exactly devoted marxists.

        • cayde6ml@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I have alot of respect for Li Qiang, and while I understand being wary of officials advocating even for limited market forces, he seems to be one of the more genuine and driven and simultaneously pro-marxist officials in the party.

          Is there anything in particular that makes you very wary of him?

          • Large Bullfrog@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            He just seems a little more pro-private enterprise then I feel comfortable with. He at least seems competent and I don’t think he is an outright revisionist like Gorbachev, but enough to make me skeptical.