This isn’t just relevant to Lemmy because it’s culturally intertwined with Lemmy but also because there’s a search engine database now that acts as a registry for anyone promoting any of the mass shooters (Luigi, Robin, Tyler, etc.).

China currently bans anyone from entering who denies their narrative about Tiananmen Square. It’s the same deal here. There’s also a couple of already-controversial Lemmy users who are collaborating with the US government by judas-kissing everyone after having honeypotted them. One of them having been infamous for banning people who promoted “blind alignment with Luigi Mangione” [sic].

  • PatrickStar@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    It’s not new news. It’s just a new development in that news. Spying was already a topic with Luigi and Robin, but Charlie Kirk’s assassination was an enormous deal apparently, with world leaders the world over paying respects. That kicked off a whole search engine based registry, which MSNBC reported on. Some of this involves a doxxing process, and even if this wasn’t already made clear, you could put two and two together and get an idea that Lemmy would play a huge part in this and would be the thing all the paper trails lead to.

    As for knowing exactly who is working with the NSA, people working for the agency would follow the same tactics. They entice a reaction, fake-debate with people, mine people for knowledge while knowing who probably is and isn’t sympathetic to extremists (even though they would play it safe and treat everyone the same). They’re not afraid to outright sit down with trustees though (recall the story of Orwell ratting out his comrades), and the crew behind the search engine registry isn’t classified. Some people will brag and say they’re working with the government as a flex, and occasionally it will be consistent with events surrounding suspects.

              • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                Of course not. I don’t even know the discussion he’s talking about. If you look in my comment history, I have commented that pedophiles and child molesters are different populations and that using the words synonymously is ableism. That was super triggering to a lot of people.

              • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                A while back… There a discussion about pedo, I think OP was some vile confirmed shit, some people made off hand remarks about the wood chipper or whatever. Jerkface got into pissing context over it.

                Sure Prolly shouldn’t be killing off random people accused of being pedos but he don’t even bother to acknowledge the victims.his concern is that the pedos don’t get harmed lol

                • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  21 hours ago

                  So even in your version of things, this person (who FYI wasn’t me – you’re angry at me for correcting your ableist language, remember?) is just advocating against vigilante violence, and that’s enough to make a mortal enemy. Look, we get it. You got diddled. Fucking stop throwing it in everyone’s face and get help. Not even joking. This is clearly affecting your life and your ability to be happy. Get help.

    • Rhoerii@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      This seems like a… lot. Sometimes if someone spends too much time online, they start to see conspiracies where there aren’t any.