• Cryptagionismisogynist@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The foundation of sex is consent. If consent (including hearing about it and discussing it) is absent, then it is torture.

    And I literally mean rape and sexual assault should be considered torture, because they are and they have the same effects on the brain as classic forms of torture, and indeed both SA and rape are used as a form of torture in war. Look at the mass rapes in Ukraine. It’s not for sexual gratification, it’s to torture people, and they also happen to get off on it.

    People have different boundaries around what they discuss, especially personal info. It’s important to respect that.

    If you want to experience a less inhibited place, I recommend checking out a sex club.

    • killingspark@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The foundation of every activity people do together is consent. That doesn’t mean I need the consent of everyone in the room to talk about something.

      The second paragraph has my full support, the first one seems weird to me.

      • Cryptagionismisogynist@lemmy.worldBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, and your sex ed is incomplete if you don’t understand this.

        No, not every activity is consensual. What consent is, is a deeper question and interaction than what you’re making it out to be.

        Consent is the foundation of sexual education and sexual interactions.

        Freedom of speech is separate, and no, you don’t “need the consent of everyone in the room to talk about something,” but then you’re operating outside of consent, and you may violate emotional boundaries. That includes triggering survivors who may not have expected you to violate social norms and who would have told you, “hey, I don’t like talking about sex in front of people because I get panic attacks.”

        These interactions, being between more than 1 person, require the input of the other people. It’s not a great look to force people into accepting sex as you see it or want it.

        • killingspark@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That includes triggering survivors who may not have expected you to violate social norms and who would have told you, “hey, I don’t like talking about sex in front of people because I get panic attacks.”

          That’s true but that’s also true for any number of topics. This is a general “how/when do I talk about potentially triggering topics” issue and has nothing to do with sexual consent.

          • InputZero@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            My dude, you set up the strawman argument of speech in a conversation about sexual consent. They were just trying to explain how they’re not the same thing.

            • killingspark@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              No. I reacted to someone claiming that hearing about sex needs the hearing parties consent, the same as sex needs consent which I don’t agree with.

              Talking about sex needs to be done with some caution to not upset others, like many other topics. It’s different from the consent needed for engaging in sexual activities with someone.

              • Cryptagionismisogynist@lemmy.worldBanned
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Talking about sex needs to be done with some caution to not upset others

                This is literally what I’m saying. Upsetting others means you are violating their emotional boundaries. If they do not consent to the interaction, then they might get mad.

                It’s literally so easy to say, “hey, I’m going to bring up an adult topic, anyone uncomfortable with that?” And then if anyone says yes, say nevermind. its so easy and you all bellyaching like its a hike up a mountain is WEIRD.

                • killingspark@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That’s not the issue and you are failing to understand that. I agree with you. But the first comment said that that is the same form and level of consent needed that is needed for sex and that’s just not true.

            • killingspark@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You are actually asking me if there are other topics that might trigger people besides sex? Sod off

              • Cryptagionismisogynist@lemmy.worldBanned
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You said there’s many that are equivalent in the trauma and triggering. You can’t even name one other?

                The one I can think of - war - is quite obvious you should check in with people and just say, “I know this is a topic that can be tough to talk about, do you mind?” Eg my friend’s entire family overseas just died to the war in Ukraine/Russia. Or someone’s dad may have died in a war. Etc.

                So go on, name an example, just 1, of a topic that’s equivalent and explain why you wouldn’t want to just check in and make sure the person you’re talking with is comfortable.

                Heck, asking you for an example of your own claim was apparently triggering af, maybe use that. Is this as traumatizing as war or sexual abuse? Giving an example?

                • killingspark@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Friend, you are not getting what is happening here. We are in agreement that there are topics that might need some checking in if anyone is uncomfortable with it. That includes sex, that includes war, it includes health, it includes childhood stories.

                  I am aware of that, you are aware of that, you are just being unnecessarily confrontational. To which I say: sodd off.