The growing influence of BookTok, BookTube and Bookstagram has a researcher concerned about the content young people are engaging with, and they are calling for an industry-wide book rating classification system.
If there’s a policy that says ‘content of X classification is not allowed to be distributed to the public’, then you are against that policy. That’s not the same thing as classification.
Classification is not something that mattered much to me until I had kids. But now that I do, it is vital. I personally vet individual games for the kids. For example I allow Zelda, Minecraft, Prince of Persia, Hogwarts Legacy but don’t allow Witcher, Assassins Creed or Red Dead Redemption, yet.
Do I think these games should be censored? Not at all. But, the classification informs parents whether they should be letting their 10-year-olds access that sort of material.
In that case, I’d argue that you should be informing yourself about the product and making your own opinion on a case by case basis and showing full understanding of the thing you’re allowing, not relying on some governmental agency’s feelings.
Regardless this certainly isn’t anything that needs to be handled at a political level.
And I do inform myself on a case by case basis. My starting point is the classification of the media (I automatically permit all games/shows/movies that are PG without the kid needing to come to me for consent). The movie Robocop is a great example here. That movie is about a cool cyborg blowing away bad guys, it’s not that bad in your memory having seen it decades ago. You notice that it has an R rating, and you think harder about why that might be. Then you remember the early scene of the human cop’s death and go ‘Yeah fair enough’.
Now, I can reach this same point by re-watching the movie. But that takes a couple of hours. And the kid is asking about watching the movie now.
But that’s all classification. I see no issue with classification. I’m not really sure why you do other than there are policies that lead to censorship based on classification. If we’re talking about censorship, we’re talking about things that are illegal. I don’t want to go all straw-man, but there are things that we pretty-much all agree are not ok (eg child exploitation/abuse, Rape/snuff, revenge porn). Removing all censorship makes everything legal. I don’t think you’re wanting that any more than I do. But if we agree that some content needs to be illegal, then all you’re arguing about is what that line is.
But none of that was my point. My point was that classification is not the same thing as censorship.
Fyi this might be a useful resource to quickly review a movie. Despite the name it contains a wide range of content warnings https://www.doesthedogdie.com/
But yeah… classification isn’t censorship yet. Your point about LGBT content is a very good one.
Considering recent attempts to remove a kids book from shelves because it contained two dads (and spurious claims about it being pornographic), it’s kind of looking like conservative and religious groups are looking for any angle they can find to control content they don’t like. And once they’ve had one win, the scope will creep.
Especially combined with recent trends. There is an agenda.
Ratings and classifications are not censorship. I rather enjoyed the movie 300, but my kids aren’t ready for that sort of content yet.
If they stop you accessing something, they are censorship.
If there’s a policy that says ‘content of X classification is not allowed to be distributed to the public’, then you are against that policy. That’s not the same thing as classification.
Classification is not something that mattered much to me until I had kids. But now that I do, it is vital. I personally vet individual games for the kids. For example I allow Zelda, Minecraft, Prince of Persia, Hogwarts Legacy but don’t allow Witcher, Assassins Creed or Red Dead Redemption, yet.
Do I think these games should be censored? Not at all. But, the classification informs parents whether they should be letting their 10-year-olds access that sort of material.
In that case, I’d argue that you should be informing yourself about the product and making your own opinion on a case by case basis and showing full understanding of the thing you’re allowing, not relying on some governmental agency’s feelings.
Regardless this certainly isn’t anything that needs to be handled at a political level.
And I do inform myself on a case by case basis. My starting point is the classification of the media (I automatically permit all games/shows/movies that are PG without the kid needing to come to me for consent). The movie Robocop is a great example here. That movie is about a cool cyborg blowing away bad guys, it’s not that bad in your memory having seen it decades ago. You notice that it has an R rating, and you think harder about why that might be. Then you remember the early scene of the human cop’s death and go ‘Yeah fair enough’.
Now, I can reach this same point by re-watching the movie. But that takes a couple of hours. And the kid is asking about watching the movie now.
But that’s all classification. I see no issue with classification. I’m not really sure why you do other than there are policies that lead to censorship based on classification. If we’re talking about censorship, we’re talking about things that are illegal. I don’t want to go all straw-man, but there are things that we pretty-much all agree are not ok (eg child exploitation/abuse, Rape/snuff, revenge porn). Removing all censorship makes everything legal. I don’t think you’re wanting that any more than I do. But if we agree that some content needs to be illegal, then all you’re arguing about is what that line is.
But none of that was my point. My point was that classification is not the same thing as censorship.
Fyi this might be a useful resource to quickly review a movie. Despite the name it contains a wide range of content warnings https://www.doesthedogdie.com/
But yeah… classification isn’t censorship yet. Your point about LGBT content is a very good one.
Considering recent attempts to remove a kids book from shelves because it contained two dads (and spurious claims about it being pornographic), it’s kind of looking like conservative and religious groups are looking for any angle they can find to control content they don’t like. And once they’ve had one win, the scope will creep.
Especially combined with recent trends. There is an agenda.