• who@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    It also claimed these websites had seen cumulative downloads of 3.2m in just three months this year - from 28th February and 28th May - resulting “in an estimated loss of $170m”.

    In other words:

    • They assumed that every download was by someone who would otherwise have paid over 53 USD for it, which by itself is an absurd delusion.
    • They described imaginary money that they never had in the first place as “losses”, which is a plain lie. You can’t lose something that you never had.

    Given that both these blatant falsehoods match the propaganda that big media parasite corporations started pushing a few decades ago, it seems pretty clear who the taxpayer-funded FBI is working for.

    • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      29 days ago

      If that’s the way it works I’m going to set up bots to pirate every Mario game over and over till Nintendo goes bankrupt and I can buy it for pennies on the dollar.

      • cenzorrll@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        One of the pirate party guys made a Raspberry pi doohickey that did exactly that to show how stupid these calculations are. It constantly downloaded to a null device, or moved it to a null device once compete so the file never existed except incredibly briefly. I think it also tracked how many times it was downloaded so the “cost” could be calculated.

        • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          That’s brilliant. It’s a shame it will have no impact and the copyright mafia will continue their relentless assault until we are all microchipped at birth with neural inhibitors that physically prevents us from consuming digital material we haven’t purchased. Brain-implant DRM is the end goal.

          • monotremata@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 days ago

            The year is 2060. I’m getting ready to watch my favorite movie. I have no idea what it’s about; my NeuraLink prevents me from retaining unlicensed memories of someone else’s intellectual property. But Amazon tells me I’ve watched it over thirty times and given it an average of 4.7 stars over those viewings, which is crazy high; even stuff other people like I tend to rate under 3 stars. Apparently I’m snobby, or maybe some kind of pervert. Without more information about the content, I have no practical way of knowing. If you go on the dark web supposedly you can find forums where people will write descriptions of what they claim the films are like, but folks who have sought that stuff out consistently rate the films lower on subsequent viewings, so it’s probably not worth it. At least that’s what my AI assistant tells me.

  • TachyonTele@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    Do they only target torrent sites or something? Because there’s places that have been around for decades that are still up and fine.

    • TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      No. The one they are talking about seizing most recently served torrents, but also had direct file listings to ROMs.