• psycrow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    Fun fact, did you know that google deliberately makes their products run worse on browsers like Firefox so users will think the browsers are slow? Please support Firefox, it’s the only real browser not based on Googles technology (like Brave is), and it’s actively fighting Google’s monopoly on web browsing.

  • ZytaZiouZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Firefox for life! Well as long as they don’t go evil or bankrupt. I am not surprised at all though.

    1. Kneecap plugin performance especially for AdBlock plugins claiming it’s for security.
    2. Notify users that those plugins are slowing down Chrome.
    3. ???
    4. Profit… or people hopefully switch
    • N01R3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I mean, they’ve already started cutting some features I have used… So I’ve got Firefox and Pale Moon on my PC to cover the loss of ftp support. And since some pages don’t work in Firefox in either instance of engine, I have to have Chrome installed…

      • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I have already encountered some websites which didn’t work with Chrome very well, but did with Firefox. They mentioned it’s because of how Chrome now handles audio, the audio doesn’t start.

      • cowmouse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It genuinely sucks that some websites don’t bother to support Firefox! When you encounter one, you might want to complain to the devs and open a webcompat issue.

      • laxe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        On desktop the market share is somewhat higher.

        I switched back to Firefox ever since the Quantum release and have been loving it.

        I wish Mozilla would spend their resources on the browser instead of wasting time and money on so many other useless projects.

    • Eleu8erios@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Wish Firefox goes with Vivaldi direction. I can’t try another browser since I 'm so addicted to gestures. Plus a lot more customization is available.

  • Vangarell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Such a baseless statement. Ad blockers actually improve performance by removing random junk videos, and images from running on the site.

    I’m so glad to have switched to Firefox.

  • Maple@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    So I’ve heard good and bad things about Firefox in this thread. The bad things being mainly the performance, and some sites just don’t load…

    So my question to you is, If I’m comfortably browsing on Brave with uBlock on, is it really worth the switch right now?

    • ComeHereOrIHookYou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Performance wise widely depends on the site used. Some sites (notably Google ones) are notorious for implementing anti-competitive behavior, where if their website is visited other than a chromium based browser, it slows down or a functionality stops working.

      I mean its the whole reason why Microsoft switch from Edge Edge HTML to Edge Chromium/Blink.

      The only good reason right now if you want to stick with Chromium based browsers such as Brave is you’re heavily into browser based games as currently Chromium (and it’s older brother, webkit) are the ones that have the best webgl performance, Firefox can do it but not as fast as Chromium and performance impact is very noticeable

  • teft@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    You should switch from chrome to firefox. Less tracking built in to the browser. Also chrome is planning to deprecate manifest V2 which will break all adblockers.

    • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Unless you use a browser that uses its own ad and tracker blocking. I get fewer ads on Vivaldi without adblocking then I get on Firefox with ublock origin.

      Runs about half the resources that Firefox takes up too.

      Ad block on chromium was supposed to break in January when manifest v3 came around and it doesn’t seem like much has changed on browsers that were prepared for it like Brave and V.

      Edge and Chrome are fucked, but who cares about them anyways.

      • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I used vivaldi for a period, but it’s still Chromium. I’m trying to support the only non-chromium option out there. The more users Firefox has, the better. Chrome and Chromium are so dominant, it’s seriously problematic.

      • cowmouse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Unless you were running Firefx with outdated uBO filters, I doubt that. Vivaldi is a memory hog for me.

  • secrethat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Unpopular opinion (maybe) - But i’m using Edge, works with chrome extensions, I use BingAI for quick searches and the cleanest looking vertical tabs I’ve used without elbow grease and extensions

    • 2d@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      No, you can be quite certain that’s an unpopular opinion. And it should be.