That’s an intriguing story. I don’t think that makes him a gangster. More like something a common thief would do. That sounds like right out of a playbook of common street urchins in Paris or eastern Asia.

Glad the state department told Kraft to shove it. Could you imagine an international standoff over a fucking billionaire’s ring.

Thanks for sharing that, I hadn’t heard this story before. I wonder if there are other examples of people putting pony boy in his place.

They can be involved. No one is taking their rights to vote away. You can’t run for president until 35. You can’t be a congressman until 25. No one says it denies younger folks their representation. Let older folks vote for who best represents their ideology and values, but it’s time for upper limits for very obvious reasons.

It’s not ageism to say that young people need their fair representation in politics. The median age of America is about 40. The median age of Congress is about 60. There is a very real concern that our leaders may not truly grasp or fully understand the issues of the younger generation.

Not to mention the risk of death and health related issues is convergent with age. It can’t be avoided, no matter how much people want to pretend it shouldn’t be considered. 70+ is pushing it, 80+ is well beyond average male life expectancy. To hide behind “that’s ageism” when anyone brings it up as valid concerns is to ignore the facts.

They’re both too old. I understand why Biden is running, DNC shit the bed and didn’t offer any viable alternatives. I wish we would see a shift across the entire political spectrum to younger representatives.

Under his eye

Yup

It helps with the pacing when they’re separated. When it’s all in the title, it reads like a 5 year old telling a joke and not realizing there needs to be some natural pauses in the telling. Putting the punchline in the body ensures the reader puts the pause in the correct spot.

Back to your bridge

Could you stop putting the punchline in the title?

To add to what others have said, I’ve heard that wide adoption of NATing as a standard practice basically ensured IPv4 longevity well beyond its logical end. This along with the cost to fully upgrade a network to IPv6 meant there was no financial incentive for companies to adopt it.

With Amazon starting to charge for IPv4 addresses, it won’t be long before Google and Microsoft do the same with GCP and Azure. This may be the financial kick in the ass to get large enterprise environments to finally commit to IPv6.

I’m old enough to remember the OG Mortal Kombat controversy. If I recall, the Sega and SNES versions were different. I believe the SNES version had no blood and the Sega one had blood.

Can you enlighten the rest of us simpletons?

I’ve been out of the loop, didn’t even know these existed! I’ll have to give them a look. Thanks!

I just don’t trust tencent. They are to China like Facebook is to America in terms of casting large nets for data gathering. I agree Hasbro should let dnd go to a better care taker, but if it’s Tencent I don’t know if I’d be able to trust any official dnd software.

Luckily, dnd is well established as a physical medium, so the impact wouldn’t be too big, but the principal still stands

China buying up everything

deleted by creator

Discipline

EDIT: I wasn’t trying to insult anyone with a one word reply, but OP was describing discipline, “to train or develop by instruction and exercise especially in self-control”

Motivation is nice, but the biggest difference between a published author and an unpublished one is that the published author sat down and wrote something.

This is a great real life example of discipline. The published author has disciplined themselves to sit down and write, even when they don’t feel motivated to.

Don’t remake it like FF7. Keep the isometric view, add quality of life features, optimize the grind for modern audience, update graphics, add voice actors if desired.

Not every thing needs to be remade to look like modern Final Fantasy. I love the sprite age of FF games and think there’s a good opportunity here.

Wtf is up with the proliferation of “slams” in social media headlines? Hell, the article in question doesn’t even say “slams”, it says “condemns”.