

Fantastic Planet.


Fantastic Planet.


How does Paradox DLC work at all? The EU4 bundle with all the DLCs is on a 50% discount right now and still costs $142 CAD. Crusader Kings 2 is also over a hundred bucks at half off for all DLCs. And these are their old games that they already have sequels for. I’d literally play these games all day every day if I could but the price is prohibitively expensive and prevents me from doing so.
Wow, that’s so nice of you! I just bought a copy of Distant Worlds 1 recently, and it’s been a blast! Would love to have a copy of the second one for when I finish the first one. Failing that, I’d also love to have a copy of Shogun Showdown, it’s been on my wishlist for a while :)
Thanks for spreading Christmas cheer this year! You’re awesome 😎


deleted by creator


When you had a shop you could set up a store front page using HTML and in doing so could use your shop to broadcast messages to other players that visited your shop .


Weren’t there also player run shops, complete with fully HTML customizable store front pages?
Also weren’t fully customizable html home pages, not unlike MySpace pages, a thing in Neopets? I could swear I had one, but maybe I’m remembering wrong?
Also there was a private message system if I recall correctly that could be used to send a message to any other Neopets user.
The party of pedophilia defends pedophiles? Why I never!
Well Islam is an offshoot of Christianity, so it makes sense that they’re basically the same thing.


Publicity stunt by Disney? Do they really need publicity? They are Disney, the most publicized company of all time.


The title already says Conservative though.
USB wifi dongles are cheap and easily concealable though.


You’re right. I’m sorry, I had just woken up when I posted that and I think I may have woken up on the wrong side of the bed lol. Have a great day.


Ahh right thanks I always forget CSEC for some reason.


I know CSIS, do we have any more?


Hmm, you’re right. I suppose disingenuous was the wrong word for me to use and for that I apologize. It just seems a little strange to me to title your post about one thing, but then in the body all you reference is an off handed mention the article makes about something that is barely tangentially related to the article. I don’t know what to call it, but I guess technically you weren’t disingenuous.
Edit: Perhaps click baiting is the correct term to use here.


It might be slightly relevant but that doesn’t mean that the way you posted it wasn’t disingenuous.
Online chess is also plagued with cheaters. I don’t have much else to add to the discussion but I thought I could at least add that.