Juki@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 2 years agoEvery tech company rnlemmy.worldimagemessage-square118linkfedilinkarrow-up11.76Karrow-down125
arrow-up11.73Karrow-down1imageEvery tech company rnlemmy.worldJuki@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomessage-square118linkfedilink
minus-squareHankMardukas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down4·2 years agoAlways remember that it will only get better, never worse. They said “computers will never do x” and now x is assumed.
minus-squarePoob@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up12·2 years agoThere’s a difference between “this is AI that could be better!” and “this could one day turn into AI.” Everyone is calling their algorithms AI because it’s a buzzword that trends well.
minus-squareBatman@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 years agoThat’s not technically correct unless the thresholds in those if statements are updated on the information gained for the data.
Always remember that it will only get better, never worse.
They said “computers will never do x” and now x is assumed.
There’s a difference between “this is AI that could be better!” and “this could one day turn into AI.”
Everyone is calling their algorithms AI because it’s a buzzword that trends well.
deleted by creator
That’s not technically correct unless the thresholds in those if statements are updated on the information gained for the data.