• 3 Posts
  • 681 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: January 8th, 2025

help-circle

  • Not to be overly pedantic on the internet, but that’s not a catch 22. A catch 22 is a situation in which the only way to prevent a problem is to already have dealt with the problem. It comes from the concept in the book of the same name where the only way to get out of the draft is to have already served in the military.



  • Take a moment and think about what you just said. You presented a potential obstacle to implementing their idea and then a fairly accessible solution to that obstacle, and then concluded that it somehow can’t work, and then focused on ‘inspiring girls with the work of woman CEOs’ which suggests you think it is a better way to get women into game dev. However, only the most corporate-brained person would ever look at a CEO and feel inspired, and it wouldn’t be to make a game. Please don’t dismiss a real, practical measure, which could be implemented tomorrow and would make discrimination much more difficult, in favor a hand-wavey possible benefit via the nebulous space of ‘inspiration.’




  • There is another process at work here: semantic territorialization. A neologism was created by someone with a certain kind of knowledge. Doctorow has the kind of mental map of the world that comes from being a tech-focused author for decades. He created the term as a shorthand for a concept that is important within the domain he wants to discuss, giving a set of landmarks on his mental map that he hopes will transmit enough c0shared context to convey the shape of the territory. Then people who do not have anything like his level of experience with that area try to interpolate the space he has delineated on his map as ‘enshittification’ and think ‘Uh… platforms… that’s like what colleges do with Nazis, or something… and uh… customers… that’s us, like me when I buy things at the store… and uh… fuck it, this is too hard. I’m taking the literal approach. En-shit-ifi-ca-tion… shitty-fy-ing… make shitty. Enshittification means make shitty. Too complicated. Enshittification means was good, now bad.’ They strip out all the elements they can’t understand and are left with a shiny new semantic territory (word) that makes them feel clever, despite revealing how little they actually understand.

    It’s incredibly depressing that language is such a godawful way to transmit meaning despite being the absolute best way we have yet discovered to transmit meaning.







  • A person paid by a government to follow orders and enact violence upon a target or targets chosen by the authorities in that government… Am I describing a member of the military or a contractor for a PMC like Academi? It’s a legal distinction without a functional difference, like a corporation vs an LLC. There are limited circumstances where, in a court, they are treated differently but the product that comes from them and the processes by which it is produced are essentially the same.






  • There are inherent limits to the idea.

    Videos are almost never the best medium for advanced learning. That’s why universities aren’t just collections of DVDs. Books remain the best method for the dense transfer of ideas, and are unlikely ever to be surpassed.

    YouTube algorithms don’t analyse content, only user behaviour. Someone who likes an in-depth discussion of Anti-Oedipus might also like a Japanese music video. YouTube does not care why, only that they engaged. YouTube also actively fights niche feed curation. Liking A, B, and C, will get you A, B, and C, but also G (because it’s kind of like C, even though a human would know they’re different) 8 (because it’s vaguely similar to B) and whatever the current versions of pewdiepie, the Paul brothers, mr. beast, etc. are (because if they can get you to watch their BS, they can sell more ads for more money) regardless of how disimilar they might be to anything else you watch.