Kinda hard to let media in when they all have cameras and are going to show the extent of the rubble.

Details, right?

“It’s all witchcraft” is a more fun version of clarke’s third law.

Just saying.

Context matters.

“Men make me uncomfortable.” Could or could not be sexist. It would depend on why one feels uncomfortable and how they act on that feeling.

It’s a very fine line.

Given the additional context provided by OP… yeah she’s definitely ableist.

I dunno.

But i I remember seeing memes of using posing-tools for video games (so like you can get screenshots with really disturbing smiles.)

I wonder how quickly it’d remain as an option if all the exhibitionists got together and started unlocking it using their O-face.

little surprised that has been a thing yet. (maybe it has.)

Six seven actually made it into the dictionary? That was quick,

Also requiring facial recognition for porn?

Just, eh, make sure you know what they’re at the court for, before mocking them in person.

Just saying.

Dude doesn’t know how to apologize.

Naw. Mathmaticians are frequently dyslexic.

It’s grammarians doing it backward!

it’s funny, because I always imagined them giggling about typing 8008135 into calculators.

They wouldn’t even care.

Unless you were also grifting the free week trial thingy and not actually paying the subscription. But usually they’ll only offer that once per email account/credit card.

ETA: they do know, they just don’t care if you do or not. It’s pretty normal to roll between streaming services instead of having dozens at one time.

That sounds like a fun team.

The div in our party plays like an idiot-savant. Total himbo, except occasionally useful. (It is fun, don’t get me wrong.)

Don’t tell the our divination wizard that… they already broke out their “special” d20.

no. no it did not.

also the “victim” being a broken-dick fuckwit didn’t really help either.

Juries really aren’t there to decide whether or not it was appropriate to do a crime. They’re there to decide if a crime happened or not.

I don’t know that it’s a good thing, but it would make it hard to to get convictions for people that are likeable or who have good excuses, or are some sort of “pillar of the community” type. A judge would probably tell you that those things are meant for sentencing.

looks fluffy to me. what’s the vet say? go with that.

the hollow bronze things with the studs?

probably not some for of die- divination or otherwise. They just wouldn’t roll well. There’s a few uses for those things that seem likely. Rangefinding (mount it on a staff and peep through the holes, , some sort of symbolic use, or simply just being some sort of decorative weirdness.

(I mean, really. Think about all the jangly things people have on, like backpacks or purses or keychains. People have always been people.)

technically defense attorneys aren’t even allowed to tell people about jury nullification and if you mention it during jury selection, as a potential juror the prosecutor is going to yeet you so fast. the judge might, even, too.

I dunno. But i find it funny that even back then the divination wizards needed their special hard-to-read dice.

Like, bro. I have a chart with all your symbols on it.